anlak storytelling
All kinds
Document kinds
Loading document kinds...

Primary corpus lens for browsing and insights. Selection lives in the URL.

All formats
Orientation
Loading formats...

Landscape, portrait, square, or unknown document geometry.

Unlock
slides · global inventory

Metric

Component collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.

Search Insights JSON Unlock
Matching slides 79,264
Current window 63,091-63,120
Pages 2,643
Rows per page 30
Component: Metricclear collectionreset all
18 30 60

Component

63,091-63,120 of 79,264

filter-aware
48
Uses a press release excerpt as evidence to critique a corporate acquisition strategy.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
52
Uses a red dashed box to isolate the 'COVID Benefit' period and a second red dashed box to summarize the success rate statistics.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
53
The chart highlights Pfizer (PFE) and PFE Excl. COVID in red, while peers are in dark blue. A dashed line indicates the peer median of 77%.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
54
Uses red 'X' icons to visually emphasize the failure to meet expectations.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
55
The slide uses a visual comparison to cast doubt on management's 2023 guidance by contrasting it with the high performance of previous years.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
57
The slide uses a red color for the actuals bar and the gap annotation to emphasize the negative performance.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
58
The slide uses red bars to emphasize the negative performance and missed guidance.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
59
Uses a waterfall-style gap annotation to emphasize the magnitude of the earnings miss.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
63
The chart uses a red vertical arrow to quantify the 132-point underperformance gap.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
66
The chart uses a broken axis for the top two performers (NVO, LLY) to accommodate the scale.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
67
Uses a simple division framework to highlight capital allocation inefficiency.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
68
The slide uses a waterfall chart to frame a critique of management's capital allocation efficiency.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
69
Uses a waterfall-style buildup calculation to arrive at an incremental revenue requirement.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
70
The chart uses a standard waterfall bridge format to reconcile 2023 revenue with a target 2030 revenue figure.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
71
Uses a causal link diagram to show the impact of achieving the 38% return target on 2030 financial outcomes.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
72
This is an activist investor presentation slide from Starboard Value.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
73
The chart includes a specific data point for 'PFE (Median R&D Efficiency)' at the far right.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
04
Uses a two-part structure: a diagnostic table of failures followed by a list of required actions.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Problem StatementLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
08
The slide highlights a 21 percentage point underperformance gap.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
09
The slide uses red color coding for Autodesk to emphasize underperformance relative to the indices.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
10
The slide uses red bars and red annotations to emphasize Autodesk's underperformance relative to the indices.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
11
The slide uses red bars and red arrows to emphasize the performance gap between Autodesk and the indices.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
12
The slide uses red bars for Autodesk to emphasize underperformance and red arrows to quantify the point gap.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
13
The chart highlights significant underperformance of Autodesk relative to the indices across all timeframes.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
14
The slide highlights the performance gap between Autodesk and relevant software indices during the CEO's tenure.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
15
The chart uses a 7-year timeframe to demonstrate long-term value destruction relative to peers.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Expose ContradictionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
18
The slide uses a red dashed oval to highlight the specific financial targets, likely to contrast them with current performance in the broader activist deck.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Expose ContradictionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
05
The slide uses a 'missed' red X motif to emphasize failure to meet stated financial goals.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Jeffrey Smith
Shareholder letter Activist investor Beat · The MonsterLoop · The Reveal1 hit
06
The slide uses a 'villain' framing, attributing poor stock performance to 'subpar execution' and 'lack of faith'.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Jeffrey Smith
Shareholder letter Activist investor Beat · The StruggleLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
07
The slide argues for operational improvements and capital allocation changes at Autodesk based on peer valuation benchmarks.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Jeffrey Smith
Shareholder letter Activist investor Beat · The StruggleLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit