slides · global inventory
Disclaimer
Component collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.
Matching slides 41,127
Current window 5,791-5,820
Pages 1,371
Rows per page 30
Component
5,791-5,820 of 41,127
50
The chart uses bubble size to represent total train kms. A vertical line at 70% highlights the threshold mentioned in the title.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
54
The slide discusses the potential impact of the McNulty Rail VfM review on TOC business models.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
62
Contains two data tables showing profit impact in £m and PPT.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
65
The slide uses a bulleted list structure to categorize secondary users, existing protections, and specific concerns regarding new sharing arrangements.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
66
The slide uses a comparison table structure to evaluate policy options for secondary users.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
70
The slide uses a hierarchical list structure to define roles and responsibilities within the proposed governance framework.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
71
The slide uses a two-part structure to address two distinct governance concerns raised by the ORR.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
72
The slide uses a bulleted list to detail stakeholder feedback and specific concerns regarding regional cost/revenue sharing.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
73
The slide references a previous L.E.K. report from 28 January on Alternative Railway Structures.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
74
The slide evaluates 'Gradual roll-out', 'Big bang introduction', and 'Combined' approaches.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
79
The slide details specific assumptions for each of the four options, with Option 1 being the most detailed.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
81
The slide serves as a methodology disclosure for the evaluation framework.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
83
The slide uses a scoring system of ++, +, 0, -, -- to evaluate criteria.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
84
The slide uses a color-coded table to map categories and criteria to scores and mitigation actions.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
85
The slide outlines a specific implementation strategy (phased approach) to mitigate risks associated with a proposed policy option.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
87
Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011)Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
94
The slide compares two scenarios based on regional vs national level mechanisms. The data shows how volatility and correlation affect financial outcomes.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
95
L.E.K. consulting slide discussing rail industry cost and revenue sharing mechanisms.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
97
The slide uses a structured table to map specific criteria (A-F) to their performance scores and proposed mitigation actions.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
99
The slide outlines a specific strategic option for industry cost/revenue sharing, highlighting the trade-off between revenue exposure and fixed cost reduction.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
101
The slide uses a table to compare four scenarios (No sharing, Full sharing, TOC pax and sch 8 revenue shared only, TOC pax revenue shared only) across 'Before', 'After', and 'Change' metrics.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
102
The slide details specific feedback from TOC representatives and mentions Network Rail's stance.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
103
The slide uses a qualitative scoring system (+, ++, 0, -) to evaluate specific criteria for a proposed revenue-sharing mechanism.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
105
The slide discusses the implications of including TOC performance in a sharing mechanism, specifically noting risks of gaming and the need for open-book accounting.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
110
The slide discusses specific issues related to Network Rail (NR) cost base, FTAC allocation methodology, and the potential for adversarial relationships between operators and infrastructure managers.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
113
The table uses a scoring system of ++, +, 0, -, -- to evaluate criteria across categories A-F.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
118
The table uses a scoring system of ++, +, 0, -, -- to evaluate criteria.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
124
Focuses on the friction between train operators/Network Rail and regulators (DfT/ORR) regarding contractual flexibility.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
127
The slide uses a 'carrot vs stick' metaphor to describe the incentive structure for stakeholder collaboration.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
128
The table uses a scoring system (++, +, 0) to evaluate specific criteria within each category.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit