anlak storytelling
All kinds
Document kinds
Loading document kinds...

Primary corpus lens for browsing and insights. Selection lives in the URL.

All formats
Orientation
Loading formats...

Landscape, portrait, square, or unknown document geometry.

Unlock
slides · global inventory

Disclaimer

Component collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.

Search Insights JSON Unlock
Matching slides 41,127
Current window 5,761-5,790
Pages 1,371
Rows per page 30
Component: Disclaimerclear collectionreset all
18 30 60

Component

5,761-5,790 of 41,127

filter-aware
12
The chart uses a BCG-branded background. The data points represent 'Pieces (B)'.Projecting US Mail volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
13
The chart uses a Marimekko layout to show volume distribution across segments, with color-coded arrows indicating growth/decline outlooks.Projecting US Mail volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
23
Projecting US Mail volumes to 2020Projecting US Mail volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
32
The chart illustrates a bridge from 23.7B to 26.2B volume.Projecting US Mail volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
37
Uses Harvey balls to represent improvement scores.Projecting US Mail volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
52
Includes qualitative market participant feedback and quantitative survey data.Project Spiritus Final report Market Study · EY Parthenon
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
56
Includes a timeline of Godox product launches and a table comparing price development across brands.Project Spiritus Final report Market Study · EY Parthenon
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
64
The slide uses a stacked bar chart to show the distribution of sales impact and a table to map segments to qualitative impacts and quotes.Project Spiritus Final report Market Study · EY Parthenon
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
66
Includes qualitative quotes from industry participants and a regional breakdown of growth expectations.Project Spiritus Final report Market Study · EY Parthenon
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
67
The chart uses a color-coded scale from dark green (increase >20%) to dark red (decrease >20%).Project Spiritus Final report Market Study · EY Parthenon
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
74
KPC stands for Key Purchasing Criteria.Project Spiritus Final report Market Study · EY Parthenon
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
85
Uses pie charts as qualitative indicators of market presence (High to Low).Project Spiritus Final report Market Study · EY Parthenon
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
99
The slide uses a table to map data sources to specific growth periods (historical, COVID-19 impact, recovery, and long-term).Project Spiritus Final report Market Study · EY Parthenon
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
01
Slide 1
Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011)Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
06
The slide continues a list of options, starting from number 5.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
07
The slide lists specific criteria and the corresponding key questions used for evaluation.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
12
The slide outlines why train operators are generally unsupportive of cost/revenue sharing unless they have direct control/influence (Option 8).Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
13
The slide is part of a series (2 of 2) and references a previous L.E.K. report on Alternative Railway Structures.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
16
L.E.K. consulting slide regarding rail industry cost and revenue sharing.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
17
L.E.K. consulting slide discussing rail industry cost and revenue sharing mechanisms.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
20
The slide uses a 'carrot vs stick' metaphor to describe the strategic approach to industry partnerships.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
25
The slide lists specific dates, workshop types, and participating organizations in the rail industry.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Golden Circle1 hit
33
The slide uses a stacked bar chart to visualize the composition of TOC revenue and a list to justify inclusion/exclusion criteria.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
34
The table evaluates four scenarios: No sharing, Full sharing, TOC pax and sch 8 revenue shared only, and TOC pax revenue shared only.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
39
The slide is part of a series (1 of 6) regarding Network Rail costs.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
41
Source: NR, Delivery Plan Update, March 2010. Note: * Including CIRAS fee.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
42
The slide evaluates the appropriateness of cost/revenue sharing mechanisms for each of the three identified influence mechanisms.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
43
The slide uses a standard comparison matrix format to evaluate strategic options.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
48
The slide critiques the PR08 EBS mechanism as ineffective due to its national scope, which weakens the link between operator actions and financial results.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
49
The slide discusses structural changes to rail network management regions.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit