slides · global inventory
Source Note
Component collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.
Matching slides 110,355
Current window 57,691-57,720
Pages 3,679
Rows per page 30
Component
57,691-57,720 of 110,355
43
The chart uses a red dashed line to emphasize the downward trend in capital efficiency.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
44
The chart is a classic industry cost curve, often used in energy sector analysis to demonstrate competitive positioning.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
45
The chart uses a dual-axis approach to show absolute dollar values for Capex and Dividends+Buybacks alongside a percentage line for Capex/CFO.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
46
The slide highlights a strategic divergence between ExxonMobil and its peers, using historical capex guidance and production forecasts to frame the company's strategy as risky or out of step.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
47
Uses torn-paper visual style for quotes.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
48
Uses torn-paper visual style for quotes.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
49
The slide uses a Goldman Sachs quote to frame the industry transformation and uses a visual 'Value Destruction Zone' annotation to emphasize poor capital allocation.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
51
Uses a timeline to juxtapose quotes against actual capital expenditure cuts.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
53
Uses a 'before-after' framing to highlight inconsistency in dividend policy, capital allocation, and performance metrics.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
55
The slide uses a donut chart to show the lack of energy experience and a table to highlight the performance of the nominees in their previous CEO roles.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
56
The slide uses a three-column layout to contrast the specific failures of three individuals, followed by a collective critique.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
57
The slide uses a three-column layout to contrast the qualifications of three specific board members against the activist's requirements.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
58
The slide uses a timeline to highlight the hypocrisy of the board's selection process.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
60
Uses a comparison table to systematically dismantle opposing arguments.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
61
The slide uses a direct comparison table to debunk corporate rhetoric.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
64
Uses a dual-axis chart to visually demonstrate the divergence between market cap and CEO compensation.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
66
Uses a specific case study of 2018/2019 metric changes to illustrate governance failure.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
72
Uses peer compensation metrics as a benchmark to critique ExxonMobil's lack of energy transition incentives.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
73
Uses a Bloomberg quote to frame the problem of ExxonMobil's current strategy.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
74
The chart uses a dual-line graph to show performance, with callouts linking specific dates to news headlines and corporate actions.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
77
The chart illustrates the gap between Exxon's internal projections and IEA's more conservative/decarbonization-focused scenarios.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
78
The slide uses a Redburn quote to contrast Exxon's assumptions with a <2C pathway scenario.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
79
The slide uses a stacked bar chart to contrast ExxonMobil's internal projections with BNEF and IEA scenarios.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
80
The slide uses a quote from Bloomberg's New Energy Outlook 2020 to frame the data.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
81
The slide uses a line chart to visually demonstrate that ExxonMobil's projections (highlighted in a red box) are consistently lower than those of IEA, OPEC, BP, and BNEF.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
82
Uses IEA and BNEF data to challenge the assumption that petrochemicals will be the primary driver of future oil demand growth.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
03
The table highlights key metrics including GMV, Adjusted Revenue, Gross Profit, and Adjusted EBITDA.Farfetch | Results Presentation Deck | 15 slides · Farfetch
Conference presentation Investor relations Beat · NeedLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
04
Uses a custom bridge diagram to show the relationship between GMV components and Revenue components with specific take rates.Farfetch | Results Presentation Deck | 15 slides · Farfetch
Conference presentation Investor relations Beat · NeedLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
05
The chart uses a stacked bar approach to visualize the contribution of different business segments to key financial metrics.Farfetch | Results Presentation Deck | 15 slides · Farfetch
Conference presentation Investor relations Beat · NeedLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
08
The slide uses a combination of bar charts for demand generation metrics and line charts for margin/GMV metrics.Farfetch | Results Presentation Deck | 15 slides · Farfetch
Conference presentation Investor relations Beat · NeedLoop · Logic Chain1 hit