Matching slides 78,138
Current window 56,131-56,160
Pages 2,605
Rows per page 30
Component: Chartclear collectionreset all

Component

56,131-56,160 of 78,138

filter-aware
55
The slide uses a table for revenue projections and a pie chart for contract term distribution.Cyxtera | SPAC Presentation Deck | 64 slides · Cyxtera
Conference presentation Investment bank Beat · Financials1 hit
09
Uses a comparison frame to contrast DocGo's staffing model against traditional high-cost providers.DocGo | SPAC Presentation Deck | 28 slides · DocGo
Pitch deck Investment bank Beat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
15
The slide uses a donut chart to visualize the TAM components.DocGo | SPAC Presentation Deck | 28 slides · DocGo
Pitch deck Investment bank Beat · Market Size1 hit
24
Includes footnotes regarding share assumptions and earnout exclusions.DocGo | SPAC Presentation Deck | 28 slides · DocGo
Pitch deck Investment bank Loop · Why Now1 hit
25
The slide uses a grouped bar chart format to highlight DocGo's performance relative to industry peers and the peer group median.DocGo | SPAC Presentation Deck | 28 slides · DocGo
Pitch deck Investment bank Loop · Why Now1 hit
09
The chart illustrates the reconciliation of GAAP EPS to non-GAAP EPS by adding back stock-based compensation, other non-GAAP adjustments, and amortization of acquired intangibles.DraftKings | Results Presentation Deck | 13 slides · DraftKings
Conference presentation Investor relations Beat · Visualization1 hit
11
Electronic Arts | Results Presentation Deck | 21 slidesElectronic Arts | Results Presentation Deck | 21 slides · Electronic Arts
Conference presentation Investor relations Beat · Action1 hit
12
The chart is an area chart showing cumulative growth over time without specific Y-axis values.Electronic Arts | Results Presentation Deck | 21 slides · Electronic Arts
Conference presentation Investor relations Beat · Action1 hit
07
The chart highlights ExxonMobil's significantly higher break-even price compared to peers, using a red dashed box for emphasis.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 25 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The MonsterLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
08
The slide uses a red dashed trend line to emphasize the long-term decline in capital efficiency.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 25 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The MonsterLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
10
Uses a red circle annotation to highlight ExxonMobil's low ranking in the chart.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 25 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The MonsterLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
11
The chart uses a waterfall-style logic to show how total emissions are reduced to a small subset for target setting.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 25 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The MonsterLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
13
The chart highlights the specific industry expertise (Oil & Gas, Renewable Power, etc.) of the proposed nominees.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 25 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The StruggleLoop · Before After1 hit
23
The slide uses a timeline-annotated line chart to demonstrate the correlation between activist pressure and corporate strategic shifts.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 25 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Victory1 hit
10
The slide uses a red dashed box to draw attention to ExxonMobil's data series.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Problem (Identify pain)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
11
Uses a pull-quote from the Wall Street Journal to reinforce the narrative of financial instability.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Problem (Identify pain)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
12
The chart uses a waterfall-style logic to bridge starting asset value to ending asset value, highlighting the gap as 'Potential Value destruction'.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Problem (Identify pain)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
13
Uses a stacked area chart to show the relative decline of ExxonMobil's market cap compared to Chevron.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Problem (Identify pain)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
14
Includes a chart highlighting ExxonMobil's low score compared to peers and two critical quotes.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Problem (Identify pain)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
15
The chart uses a waterfall-style logic to show how the vast majority of emissions are excluded from reduction targets.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Problem (Identify pain)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
16
The slide uses a donut chart to visualize the insignificance of carbon capture relative to total emissions.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Problem (Identify pain)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
19
The chart visualizes the collective expertise of the proposed slate.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)1 hit
27
Uses a quote from the WSJ to frame the valuation divergence between traditional energy and clean energy.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Iceberg1 hit
29
The chart is a variation of a waterfall or marimekko chart showing capital expenditure width vs IRR height.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Iceberg1 hit
30
The slide uses a series of overlapping line charts to demonstrate the 'forecast drift' or failure of long-term projections in the face of technological disruption.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Iceberg1 hit
31
The chart shows normalized share price performance from 2015-2020, highlighting ExxonMobil's relative underperformance.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Iceberg1 hit
34
Uses a line chart to visualize the gap between corporate claims and climate science pathways.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Iceberg1 hit
35
Uses a line chart to compare two different company reports (2020 vs 2021) to highlight data revisions and poor performance trends.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Iceberg1 hit
38
Uses a stacked bar chart to illustrate the 'carbon tax cost increase' on gas generation compared to battery storage adders for renewables.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Iceberg1 hit
43
The chart uses a red dashed line to emphasize the downward trend in capital efficiency.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit