slides · global inventory
Source Note
Component collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.
Matching slides 110,355
Current window 52,681-52,710
Pages 3,679
Rows per page 30
Component
52,681-52,710 of 110,355
02
Slide contains redacted information marked as [***].Credit Suisse | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 22 slides · Credit Suisse
Consulting deck Investment bank Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
05
The slide uses a line chart overlaid with callout boxes to correlate stock valuation performance with specific company news and events.Credit Suisse | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 22 slides · Credit Suisse
Consulting deck Investment bank Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
06
Data presented in a multi-section table format.Credit Suisse | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 22 slides · Credit Suisse
Consulting deck Investment bank Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
09
Includes a specific callout for cash on balance sheet.Credit Suisse | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 22 slides · Credit Suisse
Consulting deck Investment bank Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Mece Breakdown1 hit
11
The slide uses a standard financial 'Sources and Uses' format to reconcile the proceeds from an asset sale with the settlement of liabilities and cash adjustments.Credit Suisse | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 22 slides · Credit Suisse
Consulting deck Investment bank Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
14
Includes a mix of tables, bar charts, and donut charts for financial benchmarking.Credit Suisse | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 22 slides · Credit Suisse
Consulting deck Investment bank Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
18
The slide uses callout boxes (A, B, C, D) to explain specific line item adjustments in the pro forma financial statement.Credit Suisse | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 22 slides · Credit Suisse
Consulting deck Investment bank Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
19
The slide uses two stacked bar charts to visualize historical and projected financial data.Credit Suisse | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 22 slides · Credit Suisse
Consulting deck Investment bank Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
20
Includes source attribution to FactSet and date of data.Credit Suisse | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 22 slides · Credit Suisse
Consulting deck Investment bank Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Voice Of Customer1 hit
21
Credit Suisse | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 22 slidesCredit Suisse | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 22 slides · Credit Suisse
Consulting deck Investment bank Loop · Voice Of Customer1 hit
06
The table shows consistent negative relative performance across almost all time periods and peer groups.Elliott Management | Activist Presentation Deck | 39 slides · Elliott Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · ProblemLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
06
The slide uses a 2x2 grid layout to categorize assets, with callout boxes highlighting key competitive advantages for each segment.Elliott Management | Activist Presentation Deck | 39 slides · Elliott Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
07
Uses a historical precedent (South32 demerger) to justify a proposed future action (DLC unification and US petroleum divestment).Elliott Management | Activist Presentation Deck | 39 slides · Elliott Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
08
The comparable portfolio is defined in the footnote as a basket of Rio Tinto, Hess, Apache, Anadarko, EOG Resources, and Woodside Petroleum.Elliott Management | Activist Presentation Deck | 39 slides · Elliott Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
10
The slide uses a consistent color scheme (blue for BHP, red for peers) across four time-series charts to demonstrate valuation gap.Elliott Management | Activist Presentation Deck | 39 slides · Elliott Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
11
The slide uses a table to demonstrate negative relative performance across all timeframes.Elliott Management | Activist Presentation Deck | 39 slides · Elliott Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · ProblemLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
12
The table highlights consistent underperformance across all time periods compared to the selected peer group.Elliott Management | Activist Presentation Deck | 39 slides · Elliott Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · ProblemLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
14
The slide uses a before-and-after diagram to illustrate the structural change from a DLC merger to a unified entity.Elliott Management | Activist Presentation Deck | 39 slides · Elliott Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Before After1 hit
15
The slide uses a dual-axis combo chart to show the growth of franking credits relative to shareholder equity.Elliott Management | Activist Presentation Deck | 39 slides · Elliott Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Before After1 hit
16
The slide uses a structured list format to present the core thesis of the activist campaign.Elliott Management | Activist Presentation Deck | 39 slides · Elliott Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Before After1 hit
21
The slide uses a 'Comparable Portfolio' methodology to debunk the diversification thesis.Elliott Management | Activist Presentation Deck | 39 slides · Elliott Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Before After1 hit
22
This is a classic activist argument for divestiture/spinoff based on lack of conglomerate synergy.Elliott Management | Activist Presentation Deck | 39 slides · Elliott Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Before After1 hit
23
The chart highlights the variance in broker valuations and the lack of consistent sum-of-the-parts (SoTP) methodology across analysts.Elliott Management | Activist Presentation Deck | 39 slides · Elliott Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Before After1 hit
25
Uses a structured argument format to justify a corporate divestiture/demerger.Elliott Management | Activist Presentation Deck | 39 slides · Elliott Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Before After1 hit
27
The slide argues that BHP's core assets are undervalued relative to peers and would benefit from a re-rating post-demerger.Elliott Management | Activist Presentation Deck | 39 slides · Elliott Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Before After1 hit
29
The slide uses a 'problem-solution' structure, contrasting historical value-destructive acquisitions with a proposed capital allocation strategy.Elliott Management | Activist Presentation Deck | 39 slides · Elliott Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Before After1 hit
30
The slide uses a structured argument to justify a specific capital allocation policy, referencing a 'Value Unlock Plan'.Elliott Management | Activist Presentation Deck | 39 slides · Elliott Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Before After1 hit
35
The slide uses a waterfall-style bridge to demonstrate value creation steps.Elliott Management | Activist Presentation Deck | 39 slides · Elliott Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Before After1 hit
38
The slide uses a 'before-after' logic implicitly by showing the removal of the DLC and Dividend Share Mechanism.Elliott Management | Activist Presentation Deck | 39 slides · Elliott Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Before After1 hit
19
The chart shows a significant decline in Wayfair's growth rate while Overstock remains relatively flat.Overstock | Results Presentation Deck | 23 slides · Overstock
Conference presentation Investor relations 1 hit