slides · global inventory
Chart
Component collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.
Matching slides 78,138
Current window 52,501-52,530
Pages 2,605
Rows per page 30
Component
52,501-52,530 of 78,138
82
The slide includes a footer note clarifying the adjustment of margins for pension expenses.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
84
The slide uses red dashed boxes to highlight contradictions in management's narrative.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
86
The slide uses a 'before-after' style comparison of 2008 vs 2016 margins to expose accounting manipulation.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
87
Uses a side-by-side comparison of tables and charts to highlight the discrepancy in historical margin reporting.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
92
Uses a quote from Dr. Kleinfeld to contrast with the actual financial performance data.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
98
Uses a quote from the former Alcoa CFO to highlight the discrepancy between projected and actual performance.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
100
The slide uses red circles with percentage declines to visually emphasize the gap between targets and actuals.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
104
Uses a visual comparison to draw a parallel between a historical corporate failure and the current target company's situation.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
106
Uses a Marimekko-style bar chart to show the impact of including/excluding Warrick on performance metrics.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
107
Uses a bar chart to show how excluding Warrick allowed management to hit a higher EBITDA target.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
111
The slide uses a bar chart to contrast 'Historic Highs' (dark teal) with 'Results' (light blue) to show that current performance is below the 3-year rolling high.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
112
Uses a waterfall chart to show the impact of divestitures on revenue and highlights the discrepancy in EBITDA/MT targets.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
117
The slide uses red dashed boxes to highlight and critique specific management claims, contrasting them with the activist's interpretation of the data.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
119
The slide uses a visual 'miss' indicator to emphasize the gap between targets and actuals.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
122
Uses a quote from 2013 to contrast with actual performance, framing the company's failure as a missed opportunity.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
126
The slide uses a bar chart to highlight the growing delta between Arconic and its peers, framing it as a lack of investor confidence.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
142
Uses a combination of bar chart and annotations to contrast 'Crisis Recovery' growth with the subsequent 'Shift to Value-Add' decline.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
157
Uses a series of bar charts to highlight the performance gap between two companies.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
159
The chart uses a callout box to explain the implication of the data (Arconic's potential sales capacity).Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
160
The chart uses a blue bar for Arconic to distinguish it from the peer group.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
161
The chart highlights that Arconic's asset age is better than the peer median, contradicting the potential excuse of an 'old asset base'.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
166
Uses a before-after comparison to demonstrate the impact of operational efficiency on financial performance.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
172
Uses a waterfall bridge to reconcile 2016 revenue to 2019 targets.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
173
Uses a pie chart to show revenue breakdown and a callout box to highlight the contradiction between management's narrative and their financial targets.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
174
The slide uses a scatter plot with a trend line to demonstrate that even with projected growth, Arconic's FCF performance is underwhelming compared to peers.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
176
Uses a stacked bar chart to compare historical revenue segments against a 2019 projection, highlighting a discrepancy with management's guidance.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
177
Uses a screenshot of an Arconic slide to highlight the lack of internal targets and reliance on market growth.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
178
The slide uses a combination of a data table and a bar chart to highlight the discrepancy between management's narrative and their internal projections.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
184
The slide uses a scatter plot to debunk the idea that shipset growth equals market share gain by highlighting the shift to more expensive materials.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
191
Uses a waterfall-style diagram to show margin drivers and bar charts to compare financials with and without the packaging business.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit