anlak storytelling
All kinds
Document kinds
Loading document kinds...

Primary corpus lens for browsing and insights. Selection lives in the URL.

All formats
Orientation
Loading formats...

Landscape, portrait, square, or unknown document geometry.

Unlock
slides · global inventory

Source Note

Component collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.

Search Insights JSON Unlock
Matching slides 110,355
Current window 51,691-51,720
Pages 3,679
Rows per page 30
Component: Source Noteclear collectionreset all
18 30 60

Component

51,691-51,720 of 110,355

filter-aware
35
Includes a screenshot of Google AdWords interface showing specific Patch placements.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
37
Uses a 100% stacked bar chart to show 0% positive response from a small sample size of 11 advertisers.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
38
Uses a bar chart to emphasize a 0% vs 100% result.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
39
The slide uses wireframe diagrams to illustrate ad slot pricing.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
40
The slide uses a 'Target Case' P&L table to demonstrate structural unprofitability.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
41
Uses a CEO quote to frame the guidance as insufficient.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
42
Uses a screenshot of AOL.com to demonstrate that a generic online retailer (VON VONNI) advertises on the platform, suggesting Patch's ad revenue is not necessarily tied to local Patch-specific demand.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
43
The slide uses a hub-and-spoke diagram to link a central ad source to multiple local news sites.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
44
Uses a series of bulleted arguments to dismantle management's claims regarding revenue and profitability.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
46
Includes a specific callout to the $300M loss figure and a table comparing Display vs Display+Search performance.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
47
Uses a hub-and-spoke diagram to visualize traffic flow to AOL.com.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
48
Uses a simple flow diagram to illustrate the lack of connection between Patch and AOL search traffic.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
49
The slide uses a bar chart to contrast engagement metrics, directly challenging the company's stated strategic rationale.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
50
The slide uses a rhetorical question to challenge the assumption that content ownership is a prerequisite for search utility.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
51
Uses the ceo-quote-contradiction framework to undermine management's narrative.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
52
The slide uses a red box to highlight the negative EBITDA and margins of the Display segments.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
54
Uses an 'Independent Peer Group' to contrast with AOL's existing peer group.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
55
Uses authority-citation to validate the activist's claims against the target company.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
58
Highlights the risk of 'cherry-picking' larger peers to inflate compensation.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
59
The slide uses a scatter plot with a broken axis to show the outlier status of the peer group compared to the guidelines.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
60
The slide uses red boxes to highlight 'NO' entries, visually emphasizing the failure to meet guidelines.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
61
The slide uses red circles to highlight the 'Multiple of AOL' for market cap, emphasizing the extreme disparity.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
63
The chart uses a broken axis for the Y-axis (Revenue) and X-axis (Market Cap) to accommodate outliers like Microsoft and Google.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
64
The slide highlights that AOL's peer group selection is biased towards larger companies, failing standard proxy advisor guidelines.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
66
The slide uses a table to contrast AOL's metrics with a peer group mean/median, highlighting that the new group is more representative.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
68
The slide uses a green border to highlight the 'Independent Peer Group' row as the compliant option.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
70
The slide uses a red dashed line to indicate the peer group median of 1.0%.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
71
The slide uses a red box to highlight the discrepancy between AOL's performance and executive compensation.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
72
The slide uses a specific 'Independent Peer Group' to expose the discrepancy in AOL's compensation benchmarking.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
76
The slide uses a strong 'villain' framing by contrasting the nominees' objective financial evaluation against Mr. Armstrong's 'emotional and personal connection'.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit