slides · global inventory
Source Note
Component collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.
Matching slides 110,355
Current window 51,031-51,060
Pages 3,679
Rows per page 30
Component
51,031-51,060 of 110,355
108
Uses a visual timeline of headshots to demonstrate board stagnation.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
109
Highlights a specific lack of industry expertise among recent board appointees.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
110
Uses red 'X' icons to visually represent the failure to enforce policy.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
111
The slide uses red dashed boxes to identify specific board members targeted for removal by Starboard Value.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
115
The slide uses a scatter plot to visually demonstrate that the peer group average falls outside the recommended 'Proxy Advisor Guidelines' box.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
116
The slide uses a scatter plot to visualize the disconnect between company size and executive compensation.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
117
The slide uses a bar chart to visually demonstrate the gap between public commitments and internal compensation targets.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
118
Uses a side-by-side bar chart comparison to highlight the gap between public promises and internal compensation metrics.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
119
Uses a contrast-pairs framework to highlight the discrepancy between public rhetoric and internal compensation incentives.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
120
The slide uses a bar chart for the target reduction and a table to highlight the peer group's lack of reduction.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
121
Uses a bar chart to compare original targets, threshold, revised targets, and actual performance to highlight the contradiction between stated policy and actual outcomes.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
122
Uses a line chart to visualize the 'skew' in incentive compensation.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
124
The slide highlights a lack of alignment in peer selection, suggesting potential governance issues.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
125
The slide uses a bar chart to highlight a governance failure where the company benchmarks against lower-performing peers to make compensation targets easier to hit.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
126
The slide uses a checkmark/cross matrix to visualize peer group volatility.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
127
The chart uses a blue dashed line to indicate the peer group average of $0.3M, with HUN highlighted in red.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
128
The slide uses a map to visualize flight frequency to leisure destinations, framing it as a governance issue.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
129
Uses LinkedIn screenshots to prove the existence of dedicated aviation staff.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
130
The slide uses a red-blue color contrast to highlight the gap between Huntsman and its peers.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
133
Uses red dashed boxes to highlight specific board members targeted for replacement.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
134
Uses a timeline-based visual to contrast board composition over time, emphasizing the 'sham' nature of the refreshment process.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
135
Uses a timeline framework to highlight contradictions between the Board's stated 'pre-planned' process and their actual reactive behavior.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
137
Uses a side-by-side comparison framework to attack specific board members.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
139
The slide uses a timeline-like structure to build a case against the nominee's integrity.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
140
Uses red dashed boxes to indicate specific board members targeted for removal.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
144
Uses quotes from ISS and Glass Lewis to establish industry consensus against the Board's action.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
145
Uses color-coding (blue for Starboard, red for Huntsman) to highlight the adversarial nature of the timeline.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
146
Uses a numbered list to highlight three specific governance failures.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
147
The slide uses a timeline to establish a pattern of behavior (precedent) to discredit the board members.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
151
The chart highlights a ratings downgrade for Huntsman while peers have maintained or improved their ratings.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit