anlak storytelling
All kinds
Document kinds
Loading document kinds...

Primary corpus lens for browsing and insights. Selection lives in the URL.

All formats
Orientation
Loading formats...

Landscape, portrait, square, or unknown document geometry.

Unlock
slides · global inventory

Source Note

Component collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.

Search Insights JSON Unlock
Matching slides 110,355
Current window 50,761-50,790
Pages 3,679
Rows per page 30
Component: Source Noteclear collectionreset all
18 30 60

Component

50,761-50,790 of 110,355

filter-aware
33
Uses a waterfall chart to show net divestitures and a table to detail asset dispositions.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution1 hit
34
The slide uses a red 'shortfalls' column to emphasize negative performance gaps.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution1 hit
35
The slide uses a quote to highlight market skepticism regarding the company's current structure.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution1 hit
36
Uses a before-after framing to contrast current state (inefficiencies) with future state (value unlocking).Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution1 hit
37
Includes a map of Permian assets and a donut chart showing market share in the DJ Basin.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
38
The slide uses a checkmark matrix to demonstrate strategic alignment across multiple potential acquirers.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
39
The slide uses a comparative framework to suggest a path for Phillips 66 based on Marathon's historical success.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
41
The slide uses a screenshot of a previous Elliott presentation as evidence of their original thesis, then contrasts it with a table of actual results.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
42
The slide uses a waterfall-style bridge to illustrate value creation.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
45
Includes detailed footnotes regarding adjustments for specific companies like PSX, SUN, OKE, TRGP, and DOW.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
51
The slide uses a 'Potential Defense vs. Counterpoint' structure to systematically dismantle management's likely arguments.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
52
Uses a weighted average calculation to justify the company's leverage profile.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
03
Includes a bar chart comparing TSR performance before and after Elliott's involvement.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
06
The chart uses a color-coded grouping strategy to compare Phillips 66's current valuation against peer groups (Refining, Midstream MLPs, Midstream C-Corps, Chemicals).Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
07
The slide uses a red color palette to emphasize negative performance and urgency.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Problem1 hit
09
Uses a waterfall-bridge chart to illustrate value creation from current price to target price.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Problem1 hit
11
Phillips 66 (PSX)Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Before After1 hit
12
The slide uses a navigation bar at the top and a footer with the activist firm name (Elliott) and campaign name (Streamline 66).Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
13
The slide uses a 'Valuable Assets' theme to argue for the potential of the refining business under Elliott's proposed management.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
14
Includes a dual-axis chart showing EBITDA-Capex and conversion percentage over time.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
15
The slide uses a comparative benchmarking approach to justify the valuation of the midstream segment.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
16
Includes a cost curve chart showing CPChem's competitive advantage.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
20
Includes a CEO quote used to contrast with the market performance data.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate1 hit
21
The slide uses a 'villain' framing by highlighting the 'Phillips Today' column with red 'X' marks to emphasize negative performance metrics.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate1 hit
22
The slide uses a 'dilutive vs accretive' framework to argue against the conglomerate's M&A strategy.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate1 hit
24
The slide uses a 'villain' framing by highlighting the gap between management claims and actual performance metrics.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate1 hit
25
The slide uses a red banner motif to highlight negative performance areas.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate1 hit
26
The slide uses a 'villain' framing by attributing poor performance to management's reliance on consultants rather than internal expertise.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate1 hit
27
Uses a 'Promises vs. Reality' framework to highlight management credibility issues.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate1 hit
28
Uses a red-highlighted callout to contrast management's quote with the quantitative shortfall.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate1 hit