slides · global inventory
Source Note
Component collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.
Matching slides 110,355
Current window 50,311-50,340
Pages 3,679
Rows per page 30
Component
50,311-50,340 of 110,355
50
Uses a quote from the CEO to frame the contradiction before presenting the data.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Expose Contradiction1 hit
51
The slide uses a 'villain' framing, accusing management of 'TSR Acrobatics' and 're-writing history' to mask poor performance.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Expose Contradiction1 hit
53
The slide uses a before/after framing to attribute stock performance to activist intervention.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Expose ContradictionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
55
The chart uses a waterfall-style bar arrangement to show the distribution of stock reactions, with Arconic significantly outperforming the average.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Expose Contradiction1 hit
56
The chart compares the 2/1/2017 event against historical peaks, most of which occurred during the 2009 financial crisis.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Expose Contradiction1 hit
57
The slide uses a dual-line chart to contrast the performance of two entities post-separation, highlighting the impact of activist intervention.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Expose ContradictionLoop · David Goliath1 hit
58
Uses dual-axis charts to correlate trading volume spikes with share price appreciation post-announcement.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Expose ContradictionLoop · David Goliath1 hit
59
The slide uses color-coding (teal for Elliott, red for Arconic) to visually reinforce the narrative of market support for the activist.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · David Goliath1 hit
64
Uses a numbered list to frame the argument for why 2013 is the correct starting point for performance evaluation.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
66
Uses a waterfall chart to show capital allocation and a bar chart to show poor NOPAT growth.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
67
Uses a waterfall chart to decompose capital investment and a bar chart to compare Sales/NOPAT performance.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
68
The slide uses a red dashed box to highlight the negative value destruction figures.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
69
Uses a 'villain critique' style to highlight management's failure to meet stated goals.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
70
The slide uses a combination of a line chart for guidance and bar charts for EBITDA, with callout quotes from the CEO to demonstrate the contradiction between management's optimistic rhetoric and the declining financial performance.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
71
The slide uses a contrast between industry-wide success (Boeing/Airbus) and company-specific failure (Arconic) to frame the activist argument.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
72
Uses dual-axis line chart to show that widebody deliveries actually grew faster than narrowbody/regional jets during the period in question.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
74
Uses a waterfall chart to show capital allocation and a simple bar comparison for NOPAT growth.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
75
Uses a quote from 2004 to contrast with 2016 performance failures.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
76
Uses a donut chart to visually emphasize the rarity of such a large miss.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
77
Uses a quote from Dr. Klaus Kleinfeld to contrast with actual financial performance.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
79
Uses bar charts to highlight growth vs decline.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
80
The slide uses a waterfall-style comparison to highlight a $216 million revenue shortfall.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
81
The slide uses stacked bar charts to demonstrate business model overlap between Arconic EPS and PCC.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
82
The slide includes a footer note clarifying the adjustment of margins for pension expenses.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
83
Uses PCC as a benchmark to highlight an underperformance contradiction in EPS.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
84
The slide uses red dashed boxes to highlight contradictions in management's narrative.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
85
Uses a combination of a combo chart (bar/line) and a bar chart to contrast operational efficiency and asset intensity.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
86
The slide uses a 'before-after' style comparison of 2008 vs 2016 margins to expose accounting manipulation.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
87
Uses a side-by-side comparison of tables and charts to highlight the discrepancy in historical margin reporting.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
88
Uses red dashed boxes and arrows to highlight the discrepancy between reported metrics and the underlying flat trend.Arconic Inc. (ARNC) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit