slides · global inventory
Paragraph
Component collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.
Matching slides 118,471
Current window 50,191-50,220
Pages 3,950
Rows per page 30
Component
50,191-50,220 of 118,471
09
The chart uses a BCG-branded green background. It highlights a -1.5% annual decline rate.Projecting US Mail volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
14
The slide uses a dark green background typical of BCG decks. It presents qualitative evidence to support a market trend.Projecting US Mail volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
01
Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011)Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
08
The slide serves as a methodological disclosure for an executive summary section.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
09
The table uses a qualitative scoring system (++, +, 0, -, --) to evaluate options.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
11
The slide uses a traffic light system (green check, red X, question mark) to indicate implementation status for 8 options.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
15
The slide outlines a specific implementation strategy involving CP5 and CP6 periods.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
18
The slide uses a central arrow to represent the 'Cultural change' required to bridge the two approaches.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
24
The slide clarifies that the study assumes no radical changes to the roles of train operators or Network Rail.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Golden Circle1 hit
26
The table uses a color-coded matrix to show which components (NR costs/revenue, TOC revenue, TOC costs) are included or excluded for four specific options.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
27
The slide details four specific regulatory or contractual mechanisms for cost/revenue sharing in the rail industry.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
28
The slide is a continuation of a previous list, focusing on options 5-8.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
31
The slide uses a numbered list format to categorize ten distinct areas of consideration for a sharing mechanism.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
34
The table evaluates four scenarios: No sharing, Full sharing, TOC pax and sch 8 revenue shared only, and TOC pax revenue shared only.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
37
The table compares 'No sharing', 'Full sharing', 'TOC and NR cost sharing', and 'NR cost sharing only' across P&L items (revenue/cost) for TOC and NR.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
75
The chart illustrates a cumulative growth curve of re-franchising activity.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
76
The table provides a clear mapping of contractual vs. assumed timelines for rail franchises, highlighting specific regulatory or operational reasons for deviations.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
78
The table acts as a decision matrix for the 4 selected options.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
80
The slide is a continuation of a previous list, focusing on options 5 through 8.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
85
The slide outlines a specific implementation strategy (phased approach) to mitigate risks associated with a proposed policy option.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
89
The slide discusses the asymmetry of risk in an outperformance-only incentive scheme compared to a symmetrical one.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
93
The slide explains the statistical basis for cost volatility aggregation using standard deviation and covariance formulas.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
94
The slide compares two scenarios based on regional vs national level mechanisms. The data shows how volatility and correlation affect financial outcomes.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
96
The table uses a color-coded qualitative scale (+, 0, --, -) to compare Option 1 (symmetrical) and Option 2 (upside only).Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
97
The slide uses a structured table to map specific criteria (A-F) to their performance scores and proposed mitigation actions.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
105
The slide discusses the implications of including TOC performance in a sharing mechanism, specifically noting risks of gaming and the need for open-book accounting.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
121
Includes a testimonial/quote from a European train operator and a specific case example regarding South West Trains.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
122
The slide uses a vertical arrow diagram to represent increasing depth of commercial agreement.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
135
The slide uses a complex flow diagram to map the relationships between government bodies, regulators, service providers, and customers.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
137
Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011)Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit