anlak storytelling
All kinds
Document kinds
Loading document kinds...

Primary corpus lens for browsing and insights. Selection lives in the URL.

All formats
Orientation
Loading formats...

Landscape, portrait, square, or unknown document geometry.

Unlock
slides · global inventory

Paragraph

Component collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.

Search Insights JSON Unlock
Matching slides 118,471
Current window 45,511-45,540
Pages 3,950
Rows per page 30
Component: Paragraphclear collectionreset all
18 30 60

Component

45,511-45,540 of 118,471

filter-aware
09
The slide outlines 8 key levers derived from 45 efficiency proposals.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · The Reveal1 hit
13
The slide discusses logistics, IKK/Fennec phase-out, and operations optimization.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Quick Win Big Bet1 hit
14
The slide explains why certain efficiency initiatives were dropped, citing lack of potential, time constraints, or implementation conflicts.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Quick Win Big Bet1 hit
15
The slide uses a matrix-like structure to map operational areas against time periods.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Quick Win Big Bet1 hit
16
The slide uses stacked bar charts to show 'low' vs 'high' impact/potential (spænd) and includes percentage annotations for budget shares.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Quick Win Big Bet1 hit
26
The slide uses a structured list format to present diagnostic findings and proposed efficiency measures, including specific financial impact ranges.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · So What Cascade1 hit
41
The slide uses a Gantt chart format to visualize the phasing of organizational restructuring, including mergers, establishment of new units, and training changes.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Before After1 hit
43
The slide uses a structured table format to present an efficiency proposal, likely part of a larger government or defense consulting project.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Build Up1 hit
48
The slide outlines a major reorganization (Nyordning) of the Danish Navy, detailing baseline metrics, future organizational changes, risks, and implementation prerequisites.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Build Up1 hit
54
The slide uses a structured table format to present a business case for a specific efficiency proposal.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Build Up1 hit
74
The slide highlights a specific potential range for 2022 with a green circle.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · So What Cascade1 hit
90
The slide outlines potential savings (90-115 million DKK total) across five areas, detailing the first three (I-III).Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · So What Cascade1 hit
92
The slide highlights the total potential for cross-functional operational services and administrative processes, with a specific focus on the 2022 target.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · So What Cascade1 hit
99
The slide uses a structured table format to outline a specific cost-saving initiative for the Danish Ministry of Defence (Forsvaret).Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Build Up1 hit
100
The slide uses a structured table format to evaluate a specific cost-saving initiative.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Build Up1 hit
101
The slide uses a structured table format common in BCG consulting decks to outline a specific cost-saving initiative.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Build Up1 hit
106
The slide uses a BCG-style table format with nested data points in parentheses. A green circle highlights the final total overlap figure.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
107
The table lists specific efficiency proposals (EF 8, EF 24, EF 30) and their overlaps with other operational areas or administrative processes.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
108
The table shows specific overlaps between efficiency initiatives, noting that some have zero impact while others show negative values (savings/reductions).Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
109
The table lists specific efficiency proposals (EF 14, 17, 18, 21, 23, 24) and their interdependencies.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
110
The table shows zero values for all years, indicating no financial overlap identified for these specific proposals.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
111
The table shows negative values representing the overlap (deduction) between efficiency initiatives.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
112
The table lists specific efficiency proposals (EF 32, 35, 36, 40, 41, 42) and their interdependencies.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
113
The table shows negative values, indicating cost reductions or savings associated with the identified overlaps.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
114
The table outlines two specific efficiency proposal overlaps (EF 45 and general overhead reductions).Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
115
The table outlines four specific initiatives (Logistics, Structure/Concepts, Materiel/IT, and Cross-functional) and their financial impact.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
122
The slide uses a waterfall-style logic to show the distribution of FTE (årsværk) adjustments. Includes source attribution to BCG and Struensee & Co.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Segmentation Split1 hit
124
The chart shows negative values for 'Civile' and positive values for the other three categories, indicating a conversion or shift in roles.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Segmentation Split1 hit
125
The chart highlights that most reductions occur at middle management (M2xx) and leadership levels. Data is split into low and high estimates.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Segmentation Split1 hit
126
The chart compares current structure with two proposed scenarios (low span vs high span) across four job levels.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Segmentation Split1 hit