Matching slides 41,369
Current window 39,961-39,990
Pages 1,379
Rows per page 30
Component: Calloutclear collectionreset all

Component

39,961-39,990 of 41,369

filter-aware
44
The slide uses four line charts to demonstrate a persistent performance gap.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
45
The slide uses line charts to show longitudinal performance trends. The callout box summarizes the key takeaway regarding BPS ELL performance relative to state benchmarks.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
46
The slide uses line charts to compare performance trends over time (2000-2014) for different student demographics.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
47
The slide uses scatter plots with trend lines to demonstrate a negative correlation between SWD share and performance, specifically calling out Boston as an outlier.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
48
The slide uses a scatter plot with a trend line to demonstrate that Boston (BPS) performs above the expected regression line for its ELL population size.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
49
The chart shows a persistent gap between BPS and the state average, despite both showing upward trends.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
53
The slide includes a 'DRAFT' watermark and proprietary footer.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
55
The chart highlights Boston (BPS) in a darker blue color compared to the other peer cities.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
56
The chart uses a dual-axis approach to show FTEs (bars) and student population (line).5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
61
The slide uses a color-coded legend (red triangle, yellow diamond, green triangle) to indicate status for each functional area.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
64
The matrix uses a color-coded system (Green, Yellow, Grey) to categorize initiatives into Quick Wins, Long-term goals, and Not a priority.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
74
The chart uses a grouped bar format to show year-over-year change for multiple cities.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
76
The slide uses horizontal bar charts to compare Boston (orange) against other districts (blue).5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
81
The chart highlights a 21% variance for BPS compared to peers.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Loop · Pattern Hunter1 hit
85
The slide uses a color-coded legend (red triangle, yellow diamond, green triangle) to categorize performance, though only the yellow diamond is used in this specific view.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
87
5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
88
The slide uses a red triangle icon to denote 'Challenge' status for the 'Performance management' category.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
115
The chart shows a slight increase followed by a plateau, with a specific callout regarding the net change in schools since 1994.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
116
The chart illustrates a long-tail distribution of school sizes by physical capacity.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
117
The chart is a waterfall-style bar chart representing individual school utilization rates.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
118
The slide uses a dual-line projection model (best/worst case) to illustrate future facility needs.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
119
The slide uses a peer benchmark to argue for potential cost savings through operational efficiency.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
122
The slide uses peer benchmarking to establish credibility for financial projections.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
124
The slide uses a waterfall chart to show cumulative savings from three sets of school closures, totaling ~35M.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
126
The slide uses a causal flow structure (left side: financial inputs; right side: programmatic outputs).5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
127
Uses a case study approach to illustrate successful resource concentration strategies.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
128
The slide uses a process-flow diagram to show how three distinct criteria lead to a unified decision-making framework.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
132
The slide uses a hierarchical tree diagram to decompose the $265m total special education budget.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
136
The chart uses a scatter plot to visualize the correlation between socioeconomic status and special education designation.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
137
The chart uses a horizontal bar chart to compare individual school referral rates against the district average of 2.8%.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit