slides · global inventory
Source Note
Component collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.
Matching slides 110,355
Current window 36,781-36,810
Pages 3,679
Rows per page 30
Component
36,781-36,810 of 110,355
29
The slide uses a 'preempt_rebuttal' callout box to clarify that the activist is not anti-investment, but pro-return.The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) · Nelson Peltz
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
31
Includes a testimonial/quote from a retired GBU President to support the argument.The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) · Nelson Peltz
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
33
The slide uses a simplified org chart to illustrate the 'straight line / dotted line' reporting complexity.The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) · Nelson Peltz
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
35
Uses a red downward arrow to visually connect the 'advantages' (scale/pricing) to the 'underperformance' (margins).The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) · Nelson Peltz
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
38
The slide uses a 'before-after' style logic to highlight the lack of impact of a strategic initiative.The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) · Nelson Peltz
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
39
Uses a 'before-after' framing to demonstrate lack of progress or repetitive management cycles.The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) · Nelson Peltz
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
40
Uses a vertical timeline to demonstrate that 'structural improvements' are a recurring, potentially ineffective theme.The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) · Nelson Peltz
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
41
The slide uses a butterfly chart layout to correlate market share decline with revenue scale.The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) · Nelson Peltz
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
42
The slide uses red bars to indicate market share loss and blue bars for gain. Asterisks denote the 7 largest categories.The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) · Nelson Peltz
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
43
The slide uses a combination of a line chart to show premium segment trends and a grouped bar chart to show market share erosion over a 5-year period.The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) · Nelson Peltz
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
44
The slide uses a timeline of product launches to illustrate the 'innovation gap' post-acquisition and a bar chart to show market share erosion.The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) · Nelson Peltz
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
45
The slide outlines a decentralized operating model where GBUs function as standalone entities with opt-in shared services.The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) · Nelson Peltz
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
47
Uses a historical case study (Schick Quattro) to frame a critique of current P&G management structure.The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) · Nelson Peltz
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
49
Uses a 'three reasons' structure to build a case against management's track record.The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) · Nelson Peltz
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
50
The slide uses a comparison table to highlight the composition of two different productivity programs to support the claim of unrealistic targets.The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) · Nelson Peltz
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
51
Uses a process-flow style to contrast management claims with actual financial outcomes.The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) · Nelson Peltz
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
52
Includes a quote from P&G's 2016 Analyst Day to expose a contradiction between their claims and actual performance.The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) · Nelson Peltz
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
54
Uses a before-after framing to contrast current failure with proposed board-level oversight.The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) · Nelson Peltz
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
55
The slide uses a before-after framing to demonstrate that cost-cutting does not necessarily hinder growth.The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) · Nelson Peltz
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
57
Includes a preemptive rebuttal box clarifying that Trian is not advocating for R&D cuts.The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) · Nelson Peltz
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
58
The slide uses a timeline-based grid to highlight the stagnation in new brand development.The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) · Nelson Peltz
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
61
Uses a before-after framing to highlight a strategic error.The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) · Nelson Peltz
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
62
The Procter & Gamble Company (PG)The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) · Nelson Peltz
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
64
The slide highlights P&G's low M&A activity compared to competitors like Reckitt Benckiser and Henkel.The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) · Nelson Peltz
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
65
The slide uses a bracketed categorization (Gave Up / Struggling) to frame the M&A history as a failure of core capability.The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) · Nelson Peltz
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
66
This slide is part of an activist presentation (Trian Partners) critiquing P&G's management.The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) · Nelson Peltz
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
68
Uses a side-by-side comparison of P&G management quotes against activist 'Areas of Concern' boxes.The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) · Nelson Peltz
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
71
Uses a case study to counter a potential criticism regarding digital competence.The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) · Nelson Peltz
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
73
The slide uses a 'problem-solution' structure, identifying the 'insular culture' as the villain/problem and proposing specific hiring and succession goals as the solution.The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) · Nelson Peltz
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
74
The slide uses a 'problem-solution' structure to critique P&G's hiring practices and suggest a strategic shift.The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) · Nelson Peltz
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit