slides · global inventory
Source Note
Component collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.
Matching slides 110,355
Current window 35,371-35,400
Pages 3,679
Rows per page 30
Component
35,371-35,400 of 110,355
24
The table highlights a pattern of recurring targets for FY2023 across multiple years, suggesting a lack of progress or ambition.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Struggle1 hit
25
The slide highlights a reduction in non-GAAP operating margin targets and an increase in the Rule of 40 metric (Revenue Growth + FCF Margin) following M&A.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Struggle1 hit
26
The slide uses an excerpt from a 2021 Investor Day presentation to establish a baseline commitment.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Struggle1 hit
27
The table highlights the evolution of financial commitments over time, specifically contrasting FY2023 targets with FY2026 targets.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Struggle1 hit
28
Uses red 'X' icons to visually emphasize the failure to meet targets.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Struggle1 hit
29
Uses red dashed boxes to emphasize the negative change in guidance.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Struggle1 hit
30
Uses a callout box to highlight the specific reduction in the Rule of 40 metric.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Struggle1 hit
31
Uses red arrows and question marks to highlight the discrepancy between performance and management's revised targets.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Struggle1 hit
32
Uses a 'before-after' framing to expose a contradiction in management's stated goals.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Struggle1 hit
33
Uses red dashed boxes to emphasize lowered guidance for Revenue Growth and Revenue Growth + FCF Margin.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Struggle1 hit
34
The table highlights the gap between management's historical guidance and actual results, specifically for FY2023 and FY2026.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Struggle1 hit
35
The slide uses a 'villain' framing by highlighting repeated failures to meet guidance.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Struggle1 hit
37
The chart uses a 'Rule of 40' style metric (Growth + Margin) to benchmark performance.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Struggle1 hit
38
The slide uses a 'before-after' style logic to expose a contradiction in financial performance.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Struggle1 hit
39
Uses a structured list format to present specific cost-reduction and efficiency opportunities.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Struggle1 hit
40
ADSK is highlighted in red to show it is an outlier compared to the peer median.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Struggle1 hit
41
Uses a waterfall chart to adjust spend and a stacked bar chart to compare against peers.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
42
The chart uses a blue dashed line to indicate the peer median of 6%.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
43
The slide uses a red callout box to contrast the company's narrative of 'job cuts' with the actual net increase in headcount.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
44
Uses a 'before-after' or 'contrast' framing to highlight the gap between industry standards and Autodesk's performance.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
45
The slide uses a combination of growth metrics and peer benchmarking to argue that SBC is excessive.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
46
The slide defines the methodology for calculating incremental margins as a proxy for operating leverage.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
47
The slide uses a 'bridge' style calculation to show how revenue growth and profit growth result in a 71% incremental margin.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
48
Uses a simple arithmetic bridge to demonstrate margin efficiency.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
49
Uses a simple arithmetic bridge to highlight the gap between current consensus forecasts and the activist's proposed target.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
50
The slide uses a red callout box to emphasize that projected margins are below company targets.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
51
The slide uses a color-coded bar chart to distinguish between 'Design Software Peers' and 'Other Scaled Software Peers', with additional data rows for Revenue CAGR and Gross Margin.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
52
Includes specific cost reduction targets (500bps S&M, 300bps G&A) and incremental margin assumptions.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
54
The slide uses a callout box to emphasize the discrepancy between high payouts and modest performance.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
55
Uses a dual-chart layout to contrast historical performance periods.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit