slides · global inventory
Chart
Component collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.
Matching slides 78,129
Current window 33,361-33,390
Pages 2,605
Rows per page 30
Component
33,361-33,390 of 78,129
23
Dual-axis chart showing FTEs (bars) and Revenues (line) from 2002-2011.Evaluating NYC media sector development and setting the stage for future growth · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
24
The slide uses a stacked bar chart to compare NYC VC investment against other regions (LA, Silicon Valley, Other) and provides supporting bullet points on market maturity.Evaluating NYC media sector development and setting the stage for future growth · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
25
The slide uses a matrix-style timeline layout to track four distinct categories of activity over time.Evaluating NYC media sector development and setting the stage for future growth · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
12
The chart uses a color gradient to represent maturity levels, with 'Future-ready' being the final segment.Fast-track to future-ready performance · Accenture
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
13
The slide uses a Sankey diagram to visualize the flow of organizations between maturity stages (Stable, Efficient, Predictive, Future-ready).Fast-track to future-ready performance · Accenture
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
14
The slide uses a series of stacked bar charts to visualize survey data regarding operational maturity.Fast-track to future-ready performance · Accenture
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
16
The chart is a grouped bar chart showing current vs projected future-readiness percentages by industry.Fast-track to future-ready performance · Accenture
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
35
Fast-track to future-ready performanceFast-track to future-ready performance · Accenture
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
07
The slide details the process of creating predictive models using macroeconomic drivers and validating them against historical data.Fletcher Building – economic uncertainty analysis · Deloitte
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Zoom In1 hit
08
The chart combines historical data (grey bars) with three future scenarios (green bars for base, black line for downside, teal line for upside).Fletcher Building – economic uncertainty analysis · Deloitte
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Zoom In1 hit
09
The chart uses a combination of bar charts for historical data and a mix of bars and lines for the forecast scenarios.Fletcher Building – economic uncertainty analysis · Deloitte
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Zoom In1 hit
10
The chart uses a combination of bar charts for historical data and base scenario projections, with line overlays for downside and upside scenarios.Fletcher Building – economic uncertainty analysis · Deloitte
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
11
The chart uses a combination of bars for historical data and projections, with line overlays for scenario variations.Fletcher Building – economic uncertainty analysis · Deloitte
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
12
The chart uses a combination of bar charts for historical data and a mix of bars and lines for the three forecast scenarios.Fletcher Building – economic uncertainty analysis · Deloitte
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
13
DAE likely refers to Deloitte Access Economics.Fletcher Building – economic uncertainty analysis · Deloitte
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
04
The chart displays three scenarios (Early, Mid-point, Late) comparing actual adoption percentages against total potential percentages.Future of Work Tripartite Forum: Evidence base on the Future of Work · The Treasury
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
05
The chart uses a split-axis design to separate job losses (left) from gains (middle) and net results (right).Future of Work Tripartite Forum: Evidence base on the Future of Work · The Treasury
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
06
The slide uses a color-coded scale from red (low) to green (high) to represent employment growth projections.Future of Work Tripartite Forum: Evidence base on the Future of Work · The Treasury
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
07
The slide uses a mid-point scenario for FTE projections.Future of Work Tripartite Forum: Evidence base on the Future of Work · The Treasury
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
08
The chart segments regions into 'Highest automation adoption' and 'Lowest automation adoption' groups based on industry composition.Future of Work Tripartite Forum: Evidence base on the Future of Work · The Treasury
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
09
The chart uses a baseline historical trend and projects future unemployment based on varying speeds of technology adoption.Future of Work Tripartite Forum: Evidence base on the Future of Work · The Treasury
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
10
The chart compares 'Midpoint automation scenario' and 'Additional from earliest adoption scenario' across Japan, Australia, US, Germany, and New Zealand.Future of Work Tripartite Forum: Evidence base on the Future of Work · The Treasury
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
12
The chart illustrates a clear inverse relationship between the number of workers retrained and the projected increase in income inequality (Gini coefficient).Future of Work Tripartite Forum: Evidence base on the Future of Work · The Treasury
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
03
The chart uses icon-based bar representations (oil barrels) to visualize magnitude.Global Energy Perspective 2021 · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Complication1 hit
04
The slide highlights the shift in energy mix towards renewables, specifically noting the 1.5°C scenario requirements.Global Energy Perspective 2021 · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Complication1 hit
05
The chart uses a timeline axis from 2020 to 2040 to mark 'tipping points' for different technologies.Global Energy Perspective 2021 · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Complication1 hit
06
The chart uses a bar-stacked-100pct style logic for the cost comparison, with a specific threshold for competitiveness.Global Energy Perspective 2021 · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence1 hit
07
The slide uses a McKinsey Energy Insights source. It highlights specific peak years for different fossil fuels.Global Energy Perspective 2021 · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence1 hit
08
The slide highlights the gap between current energy transition scenarios and the 1.5°C climate goal.Global Energy Perspective 2021 · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
09
The slide uses bubble sizes to represent abatement potential, categorized by gas type (CO2, CH4, N2O).Global Energy Perspective 2021 · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit