slides · global inventory
Chart
Component collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.
Matching slides 78,129
Current window 31,381-31,410
Pages 2,605
Rows per page 30
Component
31,381-31,410 of 78,129
06
UK Electricity Efficiency PotentialUK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
07
The chart uses a waterfall structure to isolate the impact of policy on electricity demand projections.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
08
The chart uses a 'Policy Off' scenario. CAGR values are provided for specific sectors.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
09
The slide uses a waterfall-like logic to sum the impacts of two sectors on total electricity demand.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
12
The chart uses a waterfall structure to show the cumulative impact of efficiency measures on the baseline demand.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
13
This is a classic McKinsey-style abatement cost curve.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
14
The chart is a classic McKinsey-style abatement cost curve.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
15
Uses waterfall-style logic to show the decomposition of abatement potential.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
21
The slide uses a matrix layout to visualize sensitivity analysis.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
22
The slide uses a 3x3 matrix to demonstrate sensitivity, highlighting that discount rate changes have a larger impact on abatement cost than CO2 price changes.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
24
The slide uses a Gantt-chart style visualization to map policy duration and status (active vs. in consultation) across three sectors.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
36
The slide uses a color-coded matrix to represent the severity of barriers (red = high, yellow = medium, grey = low/none).UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
37
The slide uses a color-coded matrix to visualize barrier mitigation. The '2030 impact' is represented by a stacked bar chart showing captured vs uncaptured potential.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
38
The slide uses a weighted scoring system to prioritize barriers based on their impact on uncaptured potential.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
42
The slide uses testimonials to reinforce the quantitative data point that transaction costs represent 30% of total project costs.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
44
The slide uses a comparative framework to show that in the UK, the average length of home ownership (11 years) significantly exceeds the average payback period for energy efficiency measures (3 years), unlike in the US.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
50
The chart illustrates the law of diminishing returns in energy efficiency improvements.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
65
The chart uses a waterfall structure to show how individual sectors sum up to the total consumption.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
05
The slide uses a waterfall chart to decompose the revenue change.USPS Envisioning Americas Future Postal · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
06
The slide uses a bar chart to show volume changes and callouts for percentage shifts, with a secondary metric for margin contribution.USPS Envisioning Americas Future Postal · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
08
The slide uses a bar chart to contrast the massive physical footprint of the USPS against other major retail chains.USPS Envisioning Americas Future Postal · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
10
USPS Envisioning Americas Future PostalUSPS Envisioning Americas Future Postal · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
11
McKinsey & Company branding present.USPS Envisioning Americas Future Postal · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
13
The chart uses a shaded area to emphasize the magnitude of the cumulative loss.USPS Envisioning Americas Future Postal · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
15
The chart illustrates the cumulative loss over the 2010-2020 period under different scenarios.USPS Envisioning Americas Future Postal · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
17
Base Case: Workforce cost projection. Includes OPM estimates and P.L. 109-435 data.USPS Future Business Model · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
18
Base Case label at top left. McKinsey & Company branding at bottom.USPS Future Business Model · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
23
The chart compares a 'Base Case' scenario with a 'Management Action' scenario, highlighting the delta in both annual and cumulative losses.USPS Future Business Model · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
29
The slide uses a 'gap' visualization to show the difference between a 'Base Case' (red line) and an 'Actions within Postal Service control' scenario (orange line).USPS Future Business Model · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Mece Breakdown1 hit
01
McKinsey & Company branding present.USPS Selected Slides · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Situation & ContextLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit