slides · global inventory
Complication
Beat collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.
Matching slides 25,056
Current window 2,851-2,880
Pages 836
Rows per page 30
Beat
2,851-2,880 of 25,056
05
The text is fragmented across three columns, likely due to a layout issue in the source file, but the content describes survey results.EARTH DAY 2024 · Ipsos
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Complication1 hit
06
The slide uses a narrative structure to present survey findings on climate apathy among specific demographics.EARTH DAY 2024 · Ipsos
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Complication1 hit
07
Ipsos Earth Day 2024 report slide.EARTH DAY 2024 · Ipsos
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Complication1 hit
08
The slide uses a narrative approach to explain a shift in public perception based on research.EARTH DAY 2024 · Ipsos
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Complication1 hit
09
Data points: 33 countries, 65% (air quality), 63% (nature), 63% (climate change), 29% (global cost of living), 37% (G7 cost of living), 47% (Germany), 42% (Canada).EARTH DAY 2024 · Ipsos
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Complication1 hit
10
The slide highlights a gap between public expectation for climate action and perceived government inaction, suggesting a need for better communication.EARTH DAY 2024 · Ipsos
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Complication1 hit
11
EARTH DAY 2024EARTH DAY 2024 · Ipsos
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Complication1 hit
21
The chart displays 'Agree' (green bars) and 'Disagree' (purple bars) percentages, along with a 'Change Agree / 23' column.EARTH DAY 2024 · Ipsos
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem (Identify pain)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
22
The chart compares agreement levels between Female and Male respondents across four generational cohorts: Baby Boomers, Gen X, Millennials, and Gen Z.EARTH DAY 2024 · Ipsos
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem (Identify pain)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
23
The chart displays 'Agree' (green) and 'Disagree' (purple) percentages for 33 countries, along with the change from 2023.EARTH DAY 2024 · Ipsos
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem (Identify pain)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
24
The chart displays data for Baby Boomers, Gen X, Millennials, and Gen Z, split by Male and Female.EARTH DAY 2024 · Ipsos
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem (Identify pain)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
25
The chart displays a diverging bar chart comparing 'Agree' (green) and 'Disagree' (purple) sentiments across 33 countries, with a column showing year-over-year change.EARTH DAY 2024 · Ipsos
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem (Identify pain)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
26
The chart displays data for Baby Boomers, Gen X, Millennials, and Gen Z, split by Male and Female.EARTH DAY 2024 · Ipsos
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem (Identify pain)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
27
The chart displays 'Agree' (green) and 'Disagree' (purple) percentages across 33 countries, with a 'Change Agree / 23' column indicating year-over-year shifts.EARTH DAY 2024 · Ipsos
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem (Identify pain)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
28
The chart compares Male and Female responses across four generational cohorts: Baby Boomers, Gen X, Millennials, and Gen Z.EARTH DAY 2024 · Ipsos
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem (Identify pain)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
29
The chart is a diverging bar chart showing 'Agree' (green) vs 'Disagree' (purple) with a column for year-over-year change.EARTH DAY 2024 · Ipsos
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem (Identify pain)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
30
The chart compares agreement levels between males and females across four generational cohorts: Baby Boomers, Gen X, Millennials, and Gen Z.EARTH DAY 2024 · Ipsos
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem (Identify pain)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
16
The slide uses a radial layout around a central image of the Earth to categorize 10 distinct global trends.GLOBAL TRENDS 2021 Aftershocks and continuity · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · Key TrendsLoop · Golden Circle1 hit
17
The slide uses a circular diagram to map various global trends (e.g., Climate Antagonism, Peak Globalisation) as either 'Continuity' or 'Change'.GLOBAL TRENDS 2021 Aftershocks and continuity · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · Key TrendsLoop · Golden Circle1 hit
18
GLOBAL TRENDS 2021 Aftershocks and continuityGLOBAL TRENDS 2021 Aftershocks and continuity · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · Key TrendsLoop · Golden Circle1 hit
19
The chart displays longitudinal data for 9 countries, showing a general upward trend in climate concern.GLOBAL TRENDS 2021 Aftershocks and continuity · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · Key TrendsLoop · Golden Circle1 hit
20
The chart uses a dual-bar approach to show the relative importance of two distinct corporate responsibilities.GLOBAL TRENDS 2021 Aftershocks and continuity · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · Key TrendsLoop · Golden Circle1 hit
06
Data source: Ipsos Public Trust in AI, March 2024. Base: All UK adults 16+ (n=5,150).PUBLIC TRUST IN AI: IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND REGULATION · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
07
Data source: Ipsos Iris. Base sizes provided for work and general population.PUBLIC TRUST IN AI: IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND REGULATION · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
08
PUBLIC TRUST IN AI: IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND REGULATIONPUBLIC TRUST IN AI: IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND REGULATION · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
09
The chart is a stacked bar chart representing survey responses across three categories: Benefit, Equal measure, and Lose out.PUBLIC TRUST IN AI: IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND REGULATION · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
10
Data source: Ipsos AI Monitor 2024. Base: All adults 16+ (n=5,098).PUBLIC TRUST IN AI: IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND REGULATION · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
11
The chart uses clustering (Anglosphere, Europe, More Positive) to group countries by sentiment.PUBLIC TRUST IN AI: IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND REGULATION · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
12
The chart displays a clear divergence in public sentiment based on the utility vs. intrusiveness of the AI application.PUBLIC TRUST IN AI: IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND REGULATION · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
13
The chart displays comfort vs discomfort levels for 7 specific AI use cases.PUBLIC TRUST IN AI: IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND REGULATION · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit