anlak storytelling
All kinds
Document kinds
Loading document kinds...

Primary corpus lens for browsing and insights. Selection lives in the URL.

All formats
Orientation
Loading formats...

Landscape, portrait, square, or unknown document geometry.

Unlock
slides · global inventory

Evidence

Beat collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.

Search Insights JSON Unlock
Matching slides 40,452
Current window 2,551-2,580
Pages 1,349
Rows per page 30
Beat: Evidenceclear collectionreset all
18 30 60

Beat

2,551-2,580 of 40,452

filter-aware
18
The slide uses a table format to compare various abatement measures across three key metrics.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
19
The slide uses a waterfall-style layout for the electricity savings column. The 'Share of sector potential' is highlighted for Motors (26%) and Pumps (40%).UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
20
The table uses a mix of bar charts and numerical data to compare different industrial efficiency levers.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
21
The slide uses a matrix layout to visualize sensitivity analysis.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
22
The slide uses a 3x3 matrix to demonstrate sensitivity, highlighting that discount rate changes have a larger impact on abatement cost than CO2 price changes.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
23
UK Electricity Efficiency PotentialUK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
24
The slide uses a Gantt-chart style visualization to map policy duration and status (active vs. in consultation) across three sectors.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
25
The table uses a hierarchical structure to group measures by sector and provides specific descriptions for each category.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
26
The slide uses a color-coded matrix to indicate the extent of policy coverage for specific energy efficiency measures.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
27
The slide uses a color-coded bubble system to indicate the percentage of potential captured.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
28
The slide uses a color-coded bubble system to indicate the percentage of potential captured.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
29
The table highlights that most measures have low capture rates (<25%) by current Building Regulations.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
30
The slide highlights that broad policies like EU ETS have limited incremental impact on electricity demand once overlaps are accounted for.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
31
UK Electricity Efficiency PotentialUK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
32
The slide uses a numbered list with lettered sub-points to organize qualitative findings.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
33
The slide uses a two-row structure to categorize insights into 'Policy gap' and 'Complex/changing landscape', supported by qualitative user quotes.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
34
The slide uses a 'C' label for the category and includes a footnote regarding CCAs.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
35
The slide uses a hierarchical table structure to map barriers to their descriptions and real-world examples.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
36
The slide uses a color-coded matrix to represent the severity of barriers (red = high, yellow = medium, grey = low/none).UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
37
The slide uses a color-coded matrix to visualize barrier mitigation. The '2030 impact' is represented by a stacked bar chart showing captured vs uncaptured potential.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
38
The slide uses a weighted scoring system to prioritize barriers based on their impact on uncaptured potential.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
39
The slide uses a binary heatmap (barrier vs. no barrier) to visualize qualitative data across segments.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
40
The slide uses a color-coded matrix to map policy effectiveness against specific barrier types for various building sectors.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
41
The slide uses a two-row structure to contrast two distinct barriers, each supported by bullet points and direct quotes from industry stakeholders.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
42
The slide uses testimonials to reinforce the quantitative data point that transaction costs represent 30% of total project costs.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
43
EE stands for Energy Efficiency.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
44
The slide uses a comparative framework to show that in the UK, the average length of home ownership (11 years) significantly exceeds the average payback period for energy efficiency measures (3 years), unlike in the US.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
45
The slide uses a structured layout with two main points (A and B) supported by bulleted text and illustrative quotes from industry stakeholders.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
46
UK Electricity Efficiency PotentialUK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
47
The slide highlights a misalignment between corporate investment hurdles (2 years) and actual project payback periods (up to 5 years).UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit