slides · global inventory
Evidence
Beat collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.
Matching slides 40,452
Current window 1,321-1,350
Pages 1,349
Rows per page 30
Beat
1,321-1,350 of 40,452
105
Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
106
The slide uses a BCG-style table format with nested data points in parentheses. A green circle highlights the final total overlap figure.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
107
The table lists specific efficiency proposals (EF 8, EF 24, EF 30) and their overlaps with other operational areas or administrative processes.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
108
The table shows specific overlaps between efficiency initiatives, noting that some have zero impact while others show negative values (savings/reductions).Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
109
The table lists specific efficiency proposals (EF 14, 17, 18, 21, 23, 24) and their interdependencies.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
110
The table shows zero values for all years, indicating no financial overlap identified for these specific proposals.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
111
The table shows negative values representing the overlap (deduction) between efficiency initiatives.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
112
The table lists specific efficiency proposals (EF 32, 35, 36, 40, 41, 42) and their interdependencies.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
113
The table shows negative values, indicating cost reductions or savings associated with the identified overlaps.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
114
The table outlines two specific efficiency proposal overlaps (EF 45 and general overhead reductions).Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
115
The table outlines four specific initiatives (Logistics, Structure/Concepts, Materiel/IT, and Cross-functional) and their financial impact.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
322
The slide outlines the baseline, potential savings, implementation description, risks, prerequisites, and overlaps for an administrative consolidation project.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
323
The slide uses a structured table-like layout to present methodology and findings for a public sector efficiency project.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
324
The slide outlines the phasing of personnel adjustments and the resulting financial impact, noting that full potential is realized later due to civil servant tenure rules.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
325
The slide highlights that administrative tasks are currently decentralized, suggesting a consolidation opportunity based on previous successes in specific units.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
326
The slide uses a comparison matrix structure to contrast two analytical approaches.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
327
The slide details a specific methodology for calculating administrative potential in military units, emphasizing the need to account for operational requirements.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
328
The table includes a waterfall-style bar chart on the right showing the difference between HR admin ÅV and total HR ÅV.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
329
The slide uses a table to categorize administrative tasks (Tidsregistrering, Rådgivning, Organisationsændringer, Rejser) and evaluates them for consolidation.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
330
The slide presents a custom framework for evaluating administrative solution models.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
331
The slide uses a table-like structure to define two key parameters for organizational design.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
332
The slide uses a matrix-like structure to compare organizational models.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
333
The slide evaluates organizational models for administrative consolidation, emphasizing that physical proximity can be maintained across all models through management prioritization.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
334
The slide compares four organizational models (M1-M4) for administrative consolidation.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
335
The table compares four models (minimum, expanded minimum, service-based, and agency-level) across different military entities (Flyvevåbnet, Hæren, Søværnet).Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
336
The slide uses a matrix format to show the distribution of units across locations, with color-coded boxes indicating the four models. Asterisks denote 'headquarters' for units spread across multiple locations.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
337
The slide uses a BCG-style table layout with a callout box pointing to the qualitative potential column.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
338
The slide uses a matrix-like structure to map task types to their future state (centralized vs. decentralized/discontinued).Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
339
Waterfall chart shows the breakdown of full-time equivalents (Årsværk) across different defense entities.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
340
The slide details the calculation methodology for cost savings and FTE reductions, including overhead and military supplements.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit