slides · global inventory
Complication
Beat collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.
Matching slides 25,056
Current window 13,111-13,140
Pages 836
Rows per page 30
Beat
13,111-13,140 of 25,056
07
Includes a secondary table row for EPS (GAAP) below the chart.Broadridge Financial Solutions | Results Presentation Deck | 52 slides · Broadridge
Conference presentation Investor relations Beat · ProblemLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
08
The slide also provides context that the total technology and operations spend by global banks is over $190 Billion.Broadridge Financial Solutions | Results Presentation Deck | 52 slides · Broadridge
Conference presentation Investor relations Beat · ProblemLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
03
Capri Holdings | Results Presentation Deck | 15 slidesCapri Holdings | Results Presentation Deck | 15 slides · Capri Holdings
Conference presentation Investor relations Beat · NeedLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
04
The charts show a consistent recovery trend across all regions, with EMEA showing a slightly different recovery profile compared to the others.Capri Holdings | Results Presentation Deck | 15 slides · Capri Holdings
Conference presentation Investor relations Beat · NeedLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
05
The slide shows a positive trend in liquidity and a downward trend in net debt.Capri Holdings | Results Presentation Deck | 15 slides · Capri Holdings
Conference presentation Investor relations Beat · NeedLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
01
Centessa | IPO Presentation Deck | 33 slidesCentessa | IPO Presentation Deck | 33 slides · Centessa Pharmaceuticals
Pitch deck Investment bank Beat · Problem1 hit
02
Centessa | IPO Presentation Deck | 33 slidesCentessa | IPO Presentation Deck | 33 slides · Centessa Pharmaceuticals
Pitch deck Investment bank Beat · Problem1 hit
03
This is a standard IPO deal terms slide often found in roadshow decks.Centessa | IPO Presentation Deck | 33 slides · Centessa Pharmaceuticals
Pitch deck Investment bank Beat · Problem1 hit
04
The slide uses a grid layout to present 8 team members, each with a headshot, name, title, and a collection of company logos.Centessa | IPO Presentation Deck | 33 slides · Centessa Pharmaceuticals
Pitch deck Investment bank Beat · Problem1 hit
05
The slide uses a hub-and-spoke visual metaphor where five key organizational pillars feed into the central 'Asset Centricity' model.Centessa | IPO Presentation Deck | 33 slides · Centessa Pharmaceuticals
Pitch deck Investment bank Beat · Problem1 hit
13
Uses donut charts to emphasize key metrics.Cyxtera | SPAC Presentation Deck | 64 slides · Cyxtera
Conference presentation Investment bank Beat · ProblemLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
14
The chart uses a 5-year CAGR of 8% and highlights carrier-neutral colocation as the 'sweet spot'.Cyxtera | SPAC Presentation Deck | 64 slides · Cyxtera
Conference presentation Investment bank Beat · ProblemLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
07
Uses a circular diagram to represent the integration of TeleHealth and Mobility.DocGo | SPAC Presentation Deck | 28 slides · DocGo
Pitch deck Investment bank Beat · ProblemLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
08
The slide uses a comparison frame to differentiate the service from standard telemedicine.DocGo | SPAC Presentation Deck | 28 slides · DocGo
Pitch deck Investment bank Beat · ProblemLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
04
DraftKings | Results Presentation Deck | 13 slidesDraftKings | Results Presentation Deck | 13 slides · DraftKings
Conference presentation Investor relations Beat · NeedLoop · Pattern Hunter1 hit
04
Electronic Arts | Results Presentation Deck | 21 slidesElectronic Arts | Results Presentation Deck | 21 slides · Electronic Arts
Conference presentation Investor relations Beat · NeedLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
05
Electronic Arts | Results Presentation Deck | 21 slidesElectronic Arts | Results Presentation Deck | 21 slides · Electronic Arts
Conference presentation Investor relations Beat · NeedLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
06
The slide uses a split-layout: left side outlines macro industry headwinds, right side outlines specific company-level failures.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Problem (Identify pain)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
07
The slide uses two distinct time-based benchmarks (Pre-COVID and Pre-Engine No. 1 engagement) to demonstrate consistent failure to match peer performance.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Problem (Identify pain)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
08
The slide highlights the deterioration of market position, credit rating, balance sheet health, and dividend sustainability.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Problem (Identify pain)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
09
Uses pull-quotes from financial media to build a case against management's capital allocation strategy.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Problem (Identify pain)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
10
The slide uses a red dashed box to draw attention to ExxonMobil's data series.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Problem (Identify pain)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
11
Uses a pull-quote from the Wall Street Journal to reinforce the narrative of financial instability.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Problem (Identify pain)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
12
The chart uses a waterfall-style logic to bridge starting asset value to ending asset value, highlighting the gap as 'Potential Value destruction'.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Problem (Identify pain)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
13
Uses a stacked area chart to show the relative decline of ExxonMobil's market cap compared to Chevron.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Problem (Identify pain)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
14
Includes a chart highlighting ExxonMobil's low score compared to peers and two critical quotes.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Problem (Identify pain)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
15
The chart uses a waterfall-style logic to show how the vast majority of emissions are excluded from reduction targets.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Problem (Identify pain)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
16
The slide uses a donut chart to visualize the insignificance of carbon capture relative to total emissions.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Problem (Identify pain)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
17
Uses pull-quotes from financial news sources to substantiate the contradiction.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Problem (Identify pain)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
18
Uses a before-after-framing approach to contrast current failures with proposed solutions.Engine No. 1 | Activist Presentation Deck | 83 slides · Engine No. 1
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Problem (Identify pain)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit