Matching slides 40,452
Current window 5,731-5,760
Pages 1,349
Rows per page 30

Beat

5,731-5,760 of 40,452

filter-aware
08
Includes data for Charities, All businesses, and Large businesses.femke de keulenaer · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
09
The slide uses a grid-based layout to present various metrics related to cyber security posture.femke de keulenaer · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
10
femke de keulenaerfemke de keulenaer · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
11
The slide acts as a bibliography or reference list for data sources used in a broader presentation.femke de keulenaer · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
12
CIGI-IPSOS Global Survey 2019 data.femke de keulenaer · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
13
The chart uses a stacked bar approach to show 'Much More Concerned' and 'Somewhat More Concerned' segments, totaling to the 'Total Concerned' value.femke de keulenaer · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
14
The chart displays 'A Great Deal' and 'Somewhat' contributions to privacy concerns, with a historical net contribution table on the right.femke de keulenaer · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
15
The chart compares 'Main reasons' (blue) vs 'Most important' (orange) for 8 categories of cyber security investment drivers.femke de keulenaer · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
27
Investor Day Presentation 140623 FINALInvestor Day Presentation 140623 FINAL · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
28
Features logos for European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights and Ofcom.Investor Day Presentation 140623 FINAL · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
29
Uses a 3-circle Venn diagram to represent core competencies.Investor Day Presentation 140623 FINAL · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
30
Investor Day Presentation 140623 FINALInvestor Day Presentation 140623 FINAL · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
31
Investor Day Presentation 140623 FINALInvestor Day Presentation 140623 FINAL · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
07
Data from Ipsos Inequalities Index 2023.Ipsos Equalities Index 2023 Full report · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · Evidence1 hit
08
The chart tracks two definitions of fairness across four generations: Baby Boomers, Gen X, Millennials, and Gen Z.Ipsos Equalities Index 2023 Full report · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · Evidence1 hit
09
The chart displays a clear trend of increasing concern about inequality among younger generations.Ipsos Equalities Index 2023 Full report · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
10
The chart shows that younger generations (Gen Z) consistently perceive higher levels of unfair treatment across the listed groups compared to older generations.Ipsos Equalities Index 2023 Full report · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
11
The chart shows a clear divergence in perception between generations regarding who is treated more unfairly.Ipsos Equalities Index 2023 Full report · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
12
The chart shows two lines: one for women (higher, relatively flat) and one for men (lower, upward trend).Ipsos Equalities Index 2023 Full report · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
13
The chart shows a clear gender gap in perception, with women generally more likely to identify various groups as experiencing unfair treatment.Ipsos Equalities Index 2023 Full report · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
14
The slide highlights that for groups characterized by religion, nationality, ethnicity, or age, men and women have similar views.Ipsos Equalities Index 2023 Full report · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
15
The chart highlights a correlation between ethnic diversity/history of discrimination and the perception of unfair treatment.Ipsos Equalities Index 2023 Full report · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
16
Data based on 26,259 online adults across 33 countries.Ipsos Equalities Index 2023 Full report · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
17
The chart uses color-coding to represent different geographic regions (MENA, Europe, LATAM, APAC, NA, SSA).Ipsos Equalities Index 2023 Full report · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
18
The chart is a stacked bar chart showing three categories of sentiment per country.Ipsos Equalities Index 2023 Full report · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
19
The data is presented as a heatmap where higher percentages are colored red/orange and lower percentages are green.Ipsos Equalities Index 2023 Full report · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
20
The data shows a strong global consensus that the government is the primary entity responsible for reducing inequality.Ipsos Equalities Index 2023 Full report · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
21
Ipsos Equalities Index 2023 Full reportIpsos Equalities Index 2023 Full report · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
22
The chart displays two opposing views (A vs B) for each country, sorted by the percentage of respondents agreeing with statement A.Ipsos Equalities Index 2023 Full report · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
23
The chart displays a survey question comparing belief in personal merit (A) vs external factors (B) across gender, generation, income, and education.Ipsos Equalities Index 2023 Full report · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit