Matching slides 13,579
Current window 2,161-2,190
Pages 453
Rows per page 30
Arc: Triple Takeclear collectionreset all

Arc

2,161-2,190 of 13,579

filter-aware
134
The table displays financial impact data across multiple organizational units. The rows represent specific initiatives, and columns represent organizational entities.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
135
The table includes rows for specific initiatives (36-45) and summary rows for overlaps and totals.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
136
The table maps specific efficiency proposals (numbered 7, 12, 13, 15, 16, 21) to their corresponding task eliminations.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
137
Data source: Notat af 29. maj 2017 fra FMN.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
138
The slide details collaboration with FES (Forsvarets Bygnings- og Etablissementstjeneste) and VFK (Værnsfælles Forsvarskommando) to assess infrastructure needs and financial implications.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
09
The slide uses a grid-based layout to present the business case for an efficiency initiative.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · So What Cascade1 hit
10
Uses a classic Situation-Problem-Solution framework.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · So What Cascade1 hit
11
The slide uses a numbered list to define three procurement types, followed by a callout box indicating the scope of the proposed optimization.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · So What Cascade1 hit
12
The slide uses a matrix-style process diagram to map activities to stakeholders (Værnsstabe, VFK, KA'erne/FMI, FMN, Andre).Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · So What Cascade1 hit
13
The slide uses a numbered list format to detail three specific procurement projects (trucks, CWI radars, and terminal maneuvering area radars).Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · So What Cascade1 hit
14
The slide uses a numbered list format to detail three distinct procurement cases (Standards, Greenland vessel replacement, F-16 simulator).Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · So What Cascade1 hit
15
The slide uses a hierarchical tree structure to map cost drivers in a defense procurement context.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · So What Cascade1 hit
16
The slide lists 8 specific levers for procurement flexibility.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · So What Cascade1 hit
17
The slide uses two stacked bar charts to show total spending and addressable baseline spending, plus a detailed table of specific projects.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · So What Cascade1 hit
18
The slide uses a 5% benchmark validated by BCG based on international defense experience. The chart shows a 3-year average (2020-2022) of 45 million DKK.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · So What Cascade1 hit
19
The slide outlines a process for IPTs and lists 5 complementary initiatives. It also cites NATO countries as a precedent.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · So What Cascade1 hit
20
The slide uses a matrix structure to map stakeholders against a 9-step process, with specific callouts for IPT (Integrated Project Team) leadership.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · So What Cascade1 hit
21
The slide uses a matrix-like structure overlaid on a timeline process flow to indicate actor involvement.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · So What Cascade1 hit
22
The slide presents a structured list of 9 distinct procurement incentives, each with a brief description of its benefits.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · So What Cascade1 hit
23
The slide highlights that implementation requires minimal resources while delivering a net potential of 45 million DKK on average for the 2020-2022 period.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · So What Cascade1 hit
24
The slide outlines a specific initiative involving FMI (Danish Defence Acquisition and Logistics Organization) and the use of Integrated Project Teams.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · So What Cascade1 hit
25
The slide details the baseline calculation (1.349 billion DKK), the 3% potential savings rate, and the resulting 45 million DKK impact. It also notes that geographic impact is not relevant.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · So What Cascade1 hit
26
The slide uses a table to show the net potential over time (2018-2022) and qualitative considerations for implementation.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · So What Cascade1 hit
27
The slide uses a Gantt chart format to sequence activities. It includes a legend for activity types and realization of potential.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · So What Cascade1 hit
28
The slide uses a structured table format to outline a specific efficiency initiative (number 27).Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · So What Cascade1 hit
29
The slide uses a two-part framework (Before/After contract signing) to structure the rationale for the proposal.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · So What Cascade1 hit
30
The slide uses a BCG-style layout with a clear methodology description on the left and supporting data visualizations on the right.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · So What Cascade1 hit
31
Slide from a BCG/Struensee deck regarding procurement optimization.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · So What Cascade1 hit
32
The slide uses a visual representation of a contract document to anchor the analysis of themes.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · So What Cascade1 hit
33
The slide details the survey structure (14 topics, 4 questions each) and the respondent count (21 users) categorized by department/role (KA, ID, JA, FDD).Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · So What Cascade1 hit