anlak storytelling
All kinds
Document kinds
Loading document kinds...

Primary corpus lens for browsing and insights. Selection lives in the URL.

All formats
Orientation
Loading formats...

Landscape, portrait, square, or unknown document geometry.

Unlock
slides · global inventory

Triple Take

Arc collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.

Search Insights JSON Unlock
Matching slides 13,579
Current window 2,131-2,160
Pages 453
Rows per page 30
Arc: Triple Takeclear collectionreset all
18 30 60

Arc

2,131-2,160 of 13,579

filter-aware
104
The slide uses a table-based layout to detail the business case for a specific administrative centralization initiative.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Build Up1 hit
105
Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
106
The slide uses a BCG-style table format with nested data points in parentheses. A green circle highlights the final total overlap figure.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
107
The table lists specific efficiency proposals (EF 8, EF 24, EF 30) and their overlaps with other operational areas or administrative processes.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
108
The table shows specific overlaps between efficiency initiatives, noting that some have zero impact while others show negative values (savings/reductions).Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
109
The table lists specific efficiency proposals (EF 14, 17, 18, 21, 23, 24) and their interdependencies.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
110
The table shows zero values for all years, indicating no financial overlap identified for these specific proposals.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
111
The table shows negative values representing the overlap (deduction) between efficiency initiatives.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
112
The table lists specific efficiency proposals (EF 32, 35, 36, 40, 41, 42) and their interdependencies.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
113
The table shows negative values, indicating cost reductions or savings associated with the identified overlaps.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
114
The table outlines two specific efficiency proposal overlaps (EF 45 and general overhead reductions).Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
115
The table outlines four specific initiatives (Logistics, Structure/Concepts, Materiel/IT, and Cross-functional) and their financial impact.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
116
Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · The Action (Now What)1 hit
117
The slide outlines financial potential (855-1.135M DKK), implementation timeline (2018-2022), FTE reductions (684-931), and overhead/turnover assumptions.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Waterfall Value1 hit
118
The table includes a specific highlight (green oval) around the 2022 total net potential of 855-1135 million DKK.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Waterfall Value1 hit
119
The slide uses a matrix-like structure to present quantitative data across time and categories.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Waterfall Value1 hit
120
The slide compares current assumptions against future decision points regarding personnel turnover and resource allocation within the Danish Defense.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Waterfall Value1 hit
121
The table includes rows for specific operational areas, overlaps, total net potential, average percentage, investments, and final net potential excluding investments.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Waterfall Value1 hit
122
The slide uses a waterfall-style logic to show the distribution of FTE (årsværk) adjustments. Includes source attribution to BCG and Struensee & Co.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Segmentation Split1 hit
123
The chart displays FTE reductions across three categories: Operative, IT/Material, and Administrative, with a total column. Data is segmented by year and estimate level.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Segmentation Split1 hit
124
The chart shows negative values for 'Civile' and positive values for the other three categories, indicating a conversion or shift in roles.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Segmentation Split1 hit
125
The chart highlights that most reductions occur at middle management (M2xx) and leadership levels. Data is split into low and high estimates.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Segmentation Split1 hit
126
The chart compares current structure with two proposed scenarios (low span vs high span) across four job levels.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Segmentation Split1 hit
127
The chart compares current staffing levels against two proposed scenarios (low and high range) across four management levels.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Segmentation Split1 hit
128
The table breaks down budget reductions by department and category (operative, support/IT, administrative, and overlaps).Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Segmentation Split1 hit
129
The table breaks down budget impacts by department and category (operational, materiel/IT, administrative, and overlaps).Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Segmentation Split1 hit
130
The table displays financial and operational potential (Løn/ØD) across multiple organizational units. BCG/Struensee branding present.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
131
The table displays financial or resource potential values across multiple organizational units (VFK, Hæren, Søværnet, etc.) and specific initiatives (26-35).Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
132
The table breaks down financial potential (Løn, ØD, Anlæg) by specific organizational units and initiatives.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
133
The table displays 'Løn' (Salary) and 'ØD' (Operating Expenses) impacts for 25 initiatives across multiple organizational units.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit