anlak storytelling
All kinds
Document kinds
Loading document kinds...

Primary corpus lens for browsing and insights. Selection lives in the URL.

All formats
Orientation
Loading formats...

Landscape, portrait, square, or unknown document geometry.

Unlock
slides · global inventory

Problem Agitate Solution

Arc collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.

Search Insights JSON Unlock
Matching slides 26,550
Current window 18,031-18,060
Pages 885
Rows per page 30
Arc: Problem Agitate Solutionclear collectionreset all
18 30 60

Arc

18,031-18,060 of 26,550

filter-aware
29
Uses a bar chart to compare PSX and VLO margins over time, highlighting the 2012-2019 average as a benchmark.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution1 hit
30
Uses a contrast-pairs framework to highlight the difference between a 'High-Performing' and 'Underperforming' company.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution1 hit
31
Uses a 'best practice' framework to contrast two companies. Includes a footer section with market sentiment quotes.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution1 hit
32
Uses a red-highlighted 'communicated' box to expose a discrepancy in M&A valuation and red arrows to show cost overruns.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution1 hit
33
Uses a waterfall chart to show net divestitures and a table to detail asset dispositions.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution1 hit
34
The slide uses a red 'shortfalls' column to emphasize negative performance gaps.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution1 hit
35
The slide uses a quote to highlight market skepticism regarding the company's current structure.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution1 hit
36
Uses a before-after framing to contrast current state (inefficiencies) with future state (value unlocking).Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution1 hit
07
The slide uses a red color palette to emphasize negative performance and urgency.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Problem1 hit
08
Uses a sum-of-the-parts valuation bridge to highlight the valuation gap.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Problem1 hit
09
Uses a waterfall-bridge chart to illustrate value creation from current price to target price.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Problem1 hit
17
This slide uses a quote to establish the 'underperforming' thesis point.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate1 hit
18
The slide uses a rhetorical question as an action title to challenge management's narrative.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate1 hit
19
Uses a three-column layout to categorize the problems.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate1 hit
20
Includes a CEO quote used to contrast with the market performance data.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate1 hit
21
The slide uses a 'villain' framing by highlighting the 'Phillips Today' column with red 'X' marks to emphasize negative performance metrics.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate1 hit
22
The slide uses a 'dilutive vs accretive' framework to argue against the conglomerate's M&A strategy.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate1 hit
23
Uses a visual metaphor of a hand crushing a road sign to represent management's stubbornness.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate1 hit
24
The slide uses a 'villain' framing by highlighting the gap between management claims and actual performance metrics.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate1 hit
25
The slide uses a red banner motif to highlight negative performance areas.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate1 hit
26
The slide uses a 'villain' framing by attributing poor performance to management's reliance on consultants rather than internal expertise.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate1 hit
27
Uses a 'Promises vs. Reality' framework to highlight management credibility issues.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate1 hit
28
Uses a red-highlighted callout to contrast management's quote with the quantitative shortfall.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate1 hit
29
Uses quotes from management to expose a gap between historical performance and current excuses.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate1 hit
30
Uses a side-by-side comparison to frame Suncor as the 'High-Performing Company' and Phillips 66 as the 'Underperforming Company'.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate1 hit
31
Uses a 'best practice' framework to contrast two companies; includes a section of analyst quotes to validate Suncor's success.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate1 hit
32
Uses a 'villain' framing technique to attack management's track record on capital allocation.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate1 hit
33
Uses a waterfall chart to illustrate the net impact of divestitures vs acquisitions.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate1 hit
34
The slide uses a red-themed 'shortfalls' column to emphasize negative performance gaps.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate1 hit
35
The slide uses a quote to highlight market skepticism regarding the company's conglomerate structure.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution1 hit