anlak storytelling
All kinds
Document kinds
Loading document kinds...

Primary corpus lens for browsing and insights. Selection lives in the URL.

All formats
Orientation
Loading formats...

Landscape, portrait, square, or unknown document geometry.

Unlock
slides · global inventory

Problem Agitate Solution

Arc collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.

Search Insights JSON Unlock
Matching slides 26,550
Current window 12,751-12,780
Pages 885
Rows per page 30
Arc: Problem Agitate Solutionclear collectionreset all
18 30 60

Arc

12,751-12,780 of 26,550

filter-aware
62
The slide uses a dialogue format between a GS Analyst and the Pfizer CEO to validate the investor's thesis.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
63
The chart uses a red vertical arrow to quantify the 132-point underperformance gap.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
64
The slide uses a competitor's own internal slide as evidence of failure, specifically pointing to discontinued programs (Staphylococcus Aureus, Domagrozumab).Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
65
Pfizer Inc. (PFE)Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
66
The chart uses a broken axis for the top two performers (NVO, LLY) to accommodate the scale.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
67
Uses a simple division framework to highlight capital allocation inefficiency.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
68
The slide uses a waterfall chart to frame a critique of management's capital allocation efficiency.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
69
Uses a waterfall-style buildup calculation to arrive at an incremental revenue requirement.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
70
The chart uses a standard waterfall bridge format to reconcile 2023 revenue with a target 2030 revenue figure.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
71
Uses a causal link diagram to show the impact of achieving the 38% return target on 2030 financial outcomes.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
72
This is an activist investor presentation slide from Starboard Value.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
73
The chart includes a specific data point for 'PFE (Median R&D Efficiency)' at the far right.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
74
Pfizer Inc. (PFE)Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
04
Uses a two-part structure: a diagnostic table of failures followed by a list of required actions.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Problem StatementLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
05
The slide uses a checkmark list to summarize qualitative business strengths.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Problem StatementLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
06
The slide uses a red 'X' icon to denote negative performance indicators, followed by a rhetorical question in a dashed box to transition to the next section.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Problem StatementLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
15
The chart uses a 7-year timeframe to demonstrate long-term value destruction relative to peers.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Expose ContradictionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
16
The slide uses a numbered list to frame the company's issues as a series of failures.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Expose ContradictionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
17
Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK)Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Expose ContradictionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
18
The slide uses a red dashed oval to highlight the specific financial targets, likely to contrast them with current performance in the broader activist deck.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Expose ContradictionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
19
The table is largely empty, serving as a template for tracking target revisions over time.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Expose ContradictionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
20
The slide uses a red dashed ellipse to highlight the specific metrics being scrutinized by the activist investor.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Expose ContradictionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
21
The slide highlights a specific historical commitment to contrast with current performance or expectations.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Expose ContradictionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
22
The table is largely empty, highlighting a lack of consistent reporting or tracking of historical commitments.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Expose ContradictionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
23
The slide uses a red dashed oval to highlight the targets, likely to contrast with later performance or revised guidance.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Expose ContradictionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
24
The table highlights a pattern of historical commitments for FY2023 and FY2026, with empty columns for actuals and consensus, suggesting a critique of target reliability.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Expose ContradictionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
25
The slide uses a bridge-style comparison to show how M&A activity adjusted the company's financial targets.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Expose ContradictionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
26
Uses a screenshot of a previous investor day presentation to establish a baseline commitment.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Expose ContradictionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
27
The table highlights a pattern of consistent financial guidance across multiple years.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Expose ContradictionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
28
Uses red 'X' icons to visually emphasize failure to meet targets.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Expose ContradictionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit