anlak storytelling
All kinds
Document kinds
Loading document kinds...

Primary corpus lens for browsing and insights. Selection lives in the URL.

All formats
Orientation
Loading formats...

Landscape, portrait, square, or unknown document geometry.

Unlock
slides · global inventory

Consultants Gambit

Arc collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.

Search Insights JSON Unlock
Matching slides 39,432
Current window 11,791-11,820
Pages 1,315
Rows per page 30
Arc: Consultants Gambitclear collectionreset all
18 30 60

Arc

11,791-11,820 of 39,432

filter-aware
53
The slide uses quotes from the PR08 Determination and Network Rail's CEO to substantiate the claim of uncertainty.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
54
The slide discusses the potential impact of the McNulty Rail VfM review on TOC business models.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
55
The slide uses quotes from stakeholders to emphasize the difficulty of pricing regulatory risk into bids.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
56
Discusses RPI-X regulation, capex/opex reclassification risks, and ORR/NR/TOC incentive alignment.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
57
L.E.K. consulting slide, page 56.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
58
The slide highlights the trade-off between administrative simplicity (including all causes) and risk management (excluding specific, clearly defined causes).Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
59
The slide presents a framework for incentive alignment in cost/revenue sharing.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
60
The slide uses a two-row table-like structure to contrast two specific cost categories (Freight access charges and EC4T) and the resulting operator engagement.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
61
The slide presents two side-by-side tables comparing TOC and Network Rail financial data for CP4.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
62
Contains two data tables showing profit impact in £m and PPT.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
63
The slide discusses risk mitigation strategies (caps, re-openers) in the context of UK rail industry financial structures.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
64
The slide uses a bulleted list to build a logical argument from problem (uncertainty/risk) to solution (soft caps).Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
65
The slide uses a bulleted list structure to categorize secondary users, existing protections, and specific concerns regarding new sharing arrangements.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
66
The slide uses a comparison table structure to evaluate policy options for secondary users.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
67
The slide uses direct quotes from stakeholders to illustrate the sensitivity around information sharing.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
68
The slide highlights the misalignment between current management structures and the proposed geographic reporting requirements.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
69
The slide discusses the practicalities of a cost and revenue sharing mechanism in the UK rail industry.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
70
The slide uses a hierarchical list structure to define roles and responsibilities within the proposed governance framework.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
71
The slide uses a two-part structure to address two distinct governance concerns raised by the ORR.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
72
The slide uses a bulleted list to detail stakeholder feedback and specific concerns regarding regional cost/revenue sharing.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
73
The slide references a previous L.E.K. report from 28 January on Alternative Railway Structures.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
74
The slide evaluates 'Gradual roll-out', 'Big bang introduction', and 'Combined' approaches.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
75
The chart illustrates a cumulative growth curve of re-franchising activity.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
76
The table provides a clear mapping of contractual vs. assumed timelines for rail franchises, highlighting specific regulatory or operational reasons for deviations.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
77
Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011)Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
78
The table acts as a decision matrix for the 4 selected options.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
79
The slide details specific assumptions for each of the four options, with Option 1 being the most detailed.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
80
The slide is a continuation of a previous list, focusing on options 5 through 8.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
02
Reshaping NYCHA support functionsReshaping NYCHA support functions · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
03
Reshaping NYCHA support functionsReshaping NYCHA support functions · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Situation & Context1 hit