2024 Executive Perspectives Transformation through AI and GenAI · page 17 of 23
The slide uses a value chain approach on the left and a decision-making framework on the right.
Consulting deck · implementation_plan · present_solution · dense density
Slide locked Sign in to view
Slide schematic 6/7
callout 0/1 diagram 1/1 framework 1/1 image 1/1 list 1/1 source-note 1/1 title 1/1
1 without position callout 1
callout
Components 7
callout value-chain instance logo-grid bullet source-note headline
Tools 5
MECE Principle block · 65%
Build-vs-Partner criteria laid out as distinct, complete categories
Chunking loop · 70%Vendor space chunked into use-case rows + assessment criteria stack
Action Titles slide · 80%'Navigate the GenAI vendor ecosystem with rigorous assessment'
Canvas framework slide · 70%Build vs. partner assessment
Credibility Transfer slide · 78%Named vendor logos (Polifish, Fairgen, OpenAI, Writer...) borrow authority
Metrics 0
∅
No metrics
No metric insight is anchored to this slide.
Frameworks 4
build-vs-buy 100%
The right side explicitly compares in-house development vs. partner assessment.
Build vs Partner Assessment 85%Right panel labelled 'Build vs. partner assessment' with criteria list
value-chain 90%The left side maps activities from insights to impact.
Value Chain 65%Left axis labelled 'Insights to impact value chain' from gather to activate