The same thesis, written for four different audiences, produces four different decks. Don't average — pick a primary audience and calibrate end-to-end. Adversarial campaigns lose when authors try to write for everyone simultaneously.
The five audiences
1 · Existing shareholders (the people who can vote yes)
Your primary audience in 80% of activist campaigns. They already own the equity; you're activating them to support a vote, support a public position, or call the company.
- Temperature: warm but explanatory
- Density: high — they want to be convinced in detail
- Language: specific, operational, peer-comparative
- Length: long-form OK (60–300 pages); they're investing in the read
- Distribution: deck published, fight letters, microsite, 1-on-1 meetings with top-30 holders
2 · The target's board (the addressee of demands)
Direct addressees when the deck is paired with a public letter to the chairman. Read with hostility but care.
- Temperature: cool, factual, respectful in tone — even when the substance is damning
- Density: medium — they will share with counsel and it must survive legal review
- Language: legal-grade precision; avoid personal attacks on individual directors UNLESS you have already named replacements
- Length: shorter, more letter-like. Often the deck is a 30–50 pager paired with an open letter
- Distribution: filed with SEC, sent by FedEx with proof of delivery to the corporate secretary
3 · The broader market and media (secondary wave)
WSJ, FT, Bloomberg, CNBC. They amplify the campaign to reach shareholders you can't reach directly.
- Temperature: hot, rhetorical, quotable
- Density: low — headlines and pull-quotes travel; analysis doesn't
- Language: binary, memorable. "The truck rolled downhill." "$46bn of real estate." "Worst operating ratio of any Class I."
- Length: 40-page conference version, quotable cover slide, press release with embedded soundbites
- Distribution: embargoed advance copies to 3–5 reporters, simultaneous press release at filing time
4 · Regulators (SEC, FTC, FCA, BaFin, SEBI)
Almost exclusively for short-seller fraud exposés. The activist analogue is regulators in industry-specific contexts (railroad service quality → STB; airline competition → DOT; etc.).
- Temperature: cool, evidentiary, near-clinical
- Density: extreme — every claim carries a citation, every citation must be verifiable
- Language: documentary posture. "The filings state X. The primary source shows Y. Readers can verify Y at [link]."
- Length: long — 100+ page reports + appendices with primary documents
- Distribution: send formal complaint to regulator; simultaneously public
5 · Proxy advisors (ISS, Glass Lewis)
Critical for any proxy contest. They frame 20–30% of institutional votes via their published recommendations.
- Temperature: cool, institutional
- Density: very high — they will compare your claims to management's response in detail
- Language: structured to their public methodology — TSR comparisons, governance metrics, board refreshment standards
- Length: dedicated briefing deck (60–80 pages) + 60–90 minute presentation in person or remote
- Distribution: 4–6 weeks before the meeting, before they begin drafting their recommendation
The "primary audience" decision
For each campaign, ONE of the five is primary:
| Campaign type | Primary audience |
|---|---|
| Activist proxy fight | Shareholders + Proxy advisors |
| Activist soft pressure | Board + Shareholders |
| Short-seller fraud exposé | Market + Regulators |
| Defensive / management response | Shareholders + Proxy advisors |
| Conference presentation (Sohn etc.) | Market + Shareholders |
The other audiences are secondary; you write to them with restraint to avoid alienation, but the primary audience drives the language, length, density, and distribution.
Calibration cheat-sheet
| Dimension | Shareholders | Board | Market | Regulators | Proxy advisors |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature | Warm | Cool | Hot | Cool | Cool |
| Length | Long | Medium | Short | Long | Medium |
| Density | High | Medium | Low | Extreme | High |
| Pull-quote | Some | None | Many | None | Few |
| Personal attack | Acceptable if backed | Avoid | Acceptable | Avoid | Avoid |
| Big number | Required | Required | Required | Optional | Required |
| Source citations | Footnoted | Inline + footnoted | Sparse | Every claim | Footnoted |
| Microsite | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes |
Common mistakes
- Writing the proxy-advisor version as the launch version. Proxy advisors get a separate, denser deck after launch; the public deck is for shareholders + media.
- Personal attacks in a deck the SEC will read. Regulators are turned off by ad hominem; it suggests the substance is weak.
- Quoting Bloomberg headlines back at journalists. Self-referential media coverage as evidence is junk. Use primary sources.
- Multilingual without re-calibration. Translating the English deck word-for-word into Japanese for an Oasis Management Tokyo campaign loses the cultural register. Re-calibrate per language.
- Same length for every audience. A 200-page short-seller report is wrong for shareholders; a 30-page summary is wrong for regulators. Different artefacts.
Exemplars by primary audience
- Shareholders + Proxy advisors: Pershing Square / CP 2012, Starboard / Darden 2014, Trian / Disney 2024
- Board + Shareholders (soft pressure): Elliott / AT&T 2019, Trian / P&G 2017
- Market + Regulators (fraud): Hindenburg / Nikola, Muddy Waters / Luckin, Citron / Valeant
- Shareholders defensive: Darden Response to Starboard 2014
- Conference: Pershing Square Sohn presentations (2015, 2017)
See also
storytelling/scqa-framework.md— the SCQA arc adjusts by audience (regulators want longer Complication; markets want shorter)slides/visual-craft.md— visual register also adjusts (regulators expect monochrome density; markets expect editorial polish)campaigns/proxy-fight.md— the calendar of audience touch-pointspatterns/fraud-exposure.md— the regulator + market combination