{
  "docId": "019f6b8f-4c74-71ab-b49c-80a5dc659c02",
  "docSlug": "jarvis-outerbridge-comtech-presentation-november-2021",
  "documentTitle": "Outerbridge Comtech Presentation November 2021",
  "authorId": "outerbridge-comtech-presentation-november-2021",
  "authorName": null,
  "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
  "presentationDate": "2021-11-01 00:00:00",
  "orientation": null,
  "aspectRatio": null,
  "pageNumber": 19,
  "pageCount": 101,
  "prevPage": 18,
  "nextPage": 20,
  "slideType": "before_after",
  "function": "expose_contradiction",
  "density": "sparse",
  "nDataPoints": 12,
  "notes": "The chart uses a waterfall bridge to show the delta between the base market cap and the final market cap, highlighting the negative impact of capital allocation.",
  "elementsJson": null,
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019f6b8f-4c74-71ab-b49c-80a5dc659c02/19",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019f6b8f-4c74-71ab-b49c-80a5dc659c02",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019f6b8f-4c74-71ab-b49c-80a5dc659c02.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019f6b8f-4c74-71ab-b49c-80a5dc659c02#slide-19",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.6,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.45,
        "y": 0.2
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Waterfall chart showing market cap progression from 2016 to 2021",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "waterfall-bridge",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "de66dbf1-70dd-43cc-81b9-e93ec2ab6e30",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.92
      },
      "kind": "other",
      "text": "*CMTL's unaffected market cap prior to Acacia Research's unsolicited offer was $568M as of 10/29/2021. Source: FactSet, CMTL SEC Filings",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "source-note",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "3021d441-a362-43e6-a9e5-b7c772492cd6",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.75,
        "w": 0.39,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.205
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Acquisitions list with completion dates and purchase prices",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "3f37690e-fe91-4230-804b-d0b1a4ee286d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.55,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.03
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "$950M in Spending Since FY2016 Has Resulted in $700M Of Shareholder Value Destruction",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "bc8902c1-c9c3-4c24-9fa2-d521f5087082",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Waterfall chart",
      "slug": "waterfall-chart",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "f71679e7-43cb-4df3-86c1-362527125f07",
      "evidence": "The slide uses a waterfall chart to show the progression of market cap from 2016 to 2021.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "waterfall-bridge",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "a9ff5220-d0ee-4f55-9f35-127f6ff68904",
      "evidence": "The chart visually bridges the gap between starting and ending market cap using additive and subtractive components.",
      "confidence": 1
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 28,
      "from": 7,
      "beatId": "98e4f7ad-8de8-41a4-ae14-0c0e43066a44",
      "arcName": "Overcoming the Monster",
      "arcSlug": "overcoming-monster",
      "beatName": "Expose Contradiction",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "The document highlights various contradictions and inconsistencies in Comtech's statements and actions.",
      "position": 0,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    },
    {
      "to": 41,
      "from": 13,
      "beatId": "45e6c166-dec8-486d-b334-331bf6bb5442",
      "arcName": "Overcoming the Monster",
      "arcSlug": "overcoming-monster",
      "beatName": "Peer Benchmark",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "The document uses peer benchmarks to illustrate Comtech's underperformance.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    },
    {
      "to": 19,
      "from": 19,
      "beatId": "d31c5010-f026-434d-b068-d09cf82bac28",
      "arcName": "Overcoming the Monster",
      "arcSlug": "overcoming-monster",
      "beatName": "Before-After",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "The document presents a clear before-after analysis, highlighting the impact of Comtech's actions on shareholder value.",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 28,
      "from": 7,
      "name": "Logic Chain",
      "slug": "01-logic-chain",
      "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis",
      "matchId": "00338045-2e93-4c3b-b394-89059a72b8d2",
      "evidence": "The document presents a clear logic chain, highlighting the contradictions and inconsistencies in Comtech's statements and actions.",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "To highlight the contradictions and inconsistencies in Comtech's statements and actions",
      "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)",
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion"
    },
    {
      "to": 19,
      "from": 19,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "66eeb95e-b1ce-42aa-bab6-d5e2fd54270b",
      "evidence": "The document presents a clear cost of inaction, highlighting the impact of Comtech's actions on shareholder value.",
      "position": 1,
      "objective": "To highlight the cost of inaction and the need for change",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}