{
  "docId": "019f6b8f-3830-70a5-a3dd-95cd57a016d7",
  "docSlug": "jarvis-mckinsey-laying-the-foundations-for-a-financially-sound-industry",
  "documentTitle": "McKinsey Laying the foundations for a financially sound industry",
  "authorId": "mckinsey-laying-the-foundations-for-a-financially-sound-industry",
  "authorName": null,
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": null,
  "aspectRatio": null,
  "pageNumber": 16,
  "pageCount": 17,
  "prevPage": 15,
  "nextPage": 17,
  "slideType": "financial_analysis",
  "function": "quantify_impact",
  "density": "sparse",
  "nDataPoints": 4,
  "notes": "The slide uses a dual-axis chart to show the relationship between capacity utilization, EBITDA margin, and capacity closure needs.",
  "elementsJson": null,
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019f6b8f-3830-70a5-a3dd-95cd57a016d7/16",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019f6b8f-3830-70a5-a3dd-95cd57a016d7",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019f6b8f-3830-70a5-a3dd-95cd57a016d7.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019f6b8f-3830-70a5-a3dd-95cd57a016d7#slide-16",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.72,
        "w": 0.46,
        "x": 0.5,
        "y": 0.16
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "EBITDA Margin vs Capacity Utilization",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "line",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "4e3c5693-9f84-4d7e-933d-7d3e06e0d33a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.72,
        "w": 0.44,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.16
      },
      "kind": "diagram",
      "text": "EBITDA pool simulation logic",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "process",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "fc3195dc-df82-4977-8baa-fce64dfa35b8",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.2,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.96
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "SOURCE: McKinsey analysis",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "source-note",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "9f39ef65-f634-43a2-8b83-e8c0289fe7e1",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.12,
        "w": 0.96,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.04
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Bridging the ~50 USD/ton margin gap to reach a sustainable EBITDA margin would require closing ~300m tons of global capacity",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "action-title",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ab11c334-ea42-41e0-8a3b-274fcd732c3e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "fe854a4c-a600-4343-8b6e-4c277cb5db71",
      "evidence": "title/action-title: Bridging the ~50 USD/ton margin gap to reach a sustainable EBITDA margin would require closing ~300m tons of global capacity",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "analytical-method",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "460b32dc-3f0d-4043-8de6-fe13f880b7d8",
      "evidence": "EBITDA pool simulation logic",
      "confidence": 0.8
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 17,
      "from": 15,
      "beatId": "5683f43d-f2cb-42ae-823f-5790c33be74e",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps",
      "evidence": "The document proposes potential solutions and restructuring options",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
      "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 16,
      "from": 4,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "3052ce9a-4998-4f8f-baa8-3881920d297f",
      "evidence": "The document emphasizes the need for action to achieve a sustainable EBITDA margin",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "Highlighting the consequences of not addressing the industry's financial challenges",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}