{
  "docId": "019f6b8f-3688-75f9-b14b-82f50c3e0c34",
  "docSlug": "jarvis-mckinsey-forecasting-hca-healthcare-ebitda-growth",
  "documentTitle": "McKinsey Forecasting HCA Healthcare EBITDA Growth",
  "authorId": "mckinsey-forecasting-hca-healthcare-ebitda-growth",
  "authorName": null,
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": null,
  "aspectRatio": null,
  "pageNumber": 5,
  "pageCount": 80,
  "prevPage": 4,
  "nextPage": 6,
  "slideType": "financial_analysis",
  "function": "analyze_data",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 6,
  "notes": "The chart uses a waterfall bridge to decompose the variance into specific operational drivers.",
  "elementsJson": null,
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019f6b8f-3688-75f9-b14b-82f50c3e0c34/5",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019f6b8f-3688-75f9-b14b-82f50c3e0c34",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019f6b8f-3688-75f9-b14b-82f50c3e0c34.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019f6b8f-3688-75f9-b14b-82f50c3e0c34#slide-5",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.65,
        "y": 0.2
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Difference due to differences in assumed collections rates",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "11f662e6-3a60-468b-b537-3644c585aec0",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.25
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Subtracts from NR and PBD $250 million to reflect higher projected Self-Pay NR growth (vs. Group Model)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "78bb9385-f306-4d23-aad5-4c242f950ed6",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.45,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.35
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Waterfall chart showing EBITDA variance drivers",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "waterfall-bridge",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "38df66f3-99f5-404c-a885-acd5ccabe250",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.9
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "* Uses management projections for other operating expenses, international operations and gains from sale. Source: Henry Company data; team analysis",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "source-note",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "d9fca48f-580e-4415-80a9-5de75699bf1a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.05
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "A DIFFERENCE IN ASSUMED BAD DEBT COLLECTION RATE IS PRIMARY REASON FOR DIFFERENCE IN EBITDA BETWEEN THE TWO PROJECTIONS",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "49bffaf1-45bd-41c5-aaa9-74a01e7fb266",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Waterfall / value bridge",
      "slug": "waterfall-bridge",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "9e2d7455-e40c-4f2b-b43c-73f456548c68",
      "evidence": "chart/waterfall-bridge: Waterfall chart showing EBITDA variance drivers",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "waterfall-bridge",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "a38f30ee-8efb-46be-96db-5265c1273b86",
      "evidence": "The chart visually bridges the gap between two EBITDA values using variance components.",
      "confidence": 1
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 10,
      "from": 5,
      "beatId": "8b7438ff-bc7f-4ecb-9a8b-f4690e2d54b4",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
      "evidence": "The document analyzes the complications and challenges facing HCA Healthcare, including changes in payor class mix and service line mix.",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Complication",
      "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 20,
      "from": 5,
      "name": "Pattern Hunter",
      "slug": "02-pattern-hunter",
      "bestFor": "Time-pressed audiences, building consensus, when data is strong",
      "matchId": "32558b28-b5d8-46bf-8228-fffd66b3c446",
      "evidence": "The document analyzes patterns in HCA Healthcare's financials and industry trends, including changes in payor class mix and service line mix.",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "Identify patterns in HCA Healthcare's financials and industry trends",
      "structure": "Evidence A -> Evidence B -> Evidence C -> Pattern/Conclusion",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Group multiple pieces of evidence that together point to a pattern or conclusion"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}