{
  "docId": "019f6b8f-3474-7542-9f38-614b778d1544",
  "docSlug": "jarvis-macellum-the-childrens-place-presentation-april-2015",
  "documentTitle": "Macellum The Childrens Place Presentation April 2015",
  "authorId": "macellum-the-childrens-place-presentation-april-2015",
  "authorName": null,
  "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
  "presentationDate": "2015-04-01 00:00:00",
  "orientation": null,
  "aspectRatio": null,
  "pageNumber": 34,
  "pageCount": 62,
  "prevPage": 33,
  "nextPage": 35,
  "slideType": "peer_benchmark",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 6,
  "notes": null,
  "elementsJson": null,
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019f6b8f-3474-7542-9f38-614b778d1544/34",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019f6b8f-3474-7542-9f38-614b778d1544",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019f6b8f-3474-7542-9f38-614b778d1544.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019f6b8f-3474-7542-9f38-614b778d1544#slide-34",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.8,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.18
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "The Company's Peer Group is setting increasing targets as well.\nManagement's initial EPS Guidance in both 2014 and 2015 has been significantly worse than peers:",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "b16f3d4f-2665-4635-8ca3-e8136d26dfa7",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.85
      },
      "kind": "other",
      "text": "Source: SEC Filings. Peers include AEO, ANN, BKE, CHS, CRI, DSW, EXPR, FRAN, GIII, GPS, LB, LULU and URBN. 2015 includes KATE with EBITDA guidance of +31% to $185-$200mm versus $147mm the prior year.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "source-note",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "b993d545-93f0-4a25-b5a6-4f48f4da1088",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.62,
        "x": 0.19,
        "y": 0.315
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Initial Guidance: EPS Growth Year-Over-Year; 2014: Peer Mean 3.6%, Peer Median 6.8%, PLCE (9.5%); 2015: Peer Mean 13.6%, Peer Median 12.5%, PLCE 5.7%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "a044e13a-2ece-4acf-ad87-93499b700f53",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.08
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Targets Are Consistently Inadequate",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "76d574d7-5343-498d-a360-e2559433ed5f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison_frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "81ef50d3-fe4f-4c23-aa0f-586556460cf2",
      "evidence": "Comparing company performance metrics against a defined peer group to highlight underperformance.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 35,
      "from": 11,
      "name": "Tale Two Worlds",
      "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds",
      "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change",
      "matchId": "5f141e98-7110-44c3-8073-278a2bc49cdf",
      "evidence": "The document presents a comparison of The Children's Place with its peers, highlighting the company's underperformance",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "Contrast the performance of The Children's Place with that of its peers",
      "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity"
    },
    {
      "to": 36,
      "from": 24,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "f07f19ff-70e3-458d-b105-9f230d922d7c",
      "evidence": "The document presents a critique of the current board and management, highlighting the need for change",
      "position": 1,
      "objective": "Highlight the costs of inaction and the need for change",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}