{
  "docId": "019f6b8f-2d07-76fd-821d-28bd636a3e5d",
  "docSlug": "jarvis-lek-infrastructure-victoria-azzev-international-scan",
  "documentTitle": "LEK Infrastructure Victoria AZZEV International Scan",
  "authorId": "lek-infrastructure-victoria-azzev-international-scan",
  "authorName": null,
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": null,
  "aspectRatio": null,
  "pageNumber": 109,
  "pageCount": 228,
  "prevPage": 108,
  "nextPage": 110,
  "slideType": "comparison_table",
  "function": "compare_options",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 6,
  "notes": "The slide uses a structured comparison matrix format to contrast two regional standards.",
  "elementsJson": null,
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019f6b8f-2d07-76fd-821d-28bd636a3e5d/109",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019f6b8f-2d07-76fd-821d-28bd636a3e5d",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019f6b8f-2d07-76fd-821d-28bd636a3e5d.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019f6b8f-2d07-76fd-821d-28bd636a3e5d#slide-109",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.85,
        "x": 0.08,
        "y": 0.8
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Implications for Victoria: While the US and international standards appear favoured, it is too early to determine the implications for Victoria without a view of OEM and market adoption",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "866b0809-e028-4786-ba11-433c74a707a2",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.08,
        "y": 0.9
      },
      "kind": "other",
      "text": "Source: Austroads; China Law Insight; L.E.K. research and interviews",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "source-note",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "c611a028-ca09-49c8-a655-b8b4d1c9666d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.55,
        "w": 0.85,
        "x": 0.08,
        "y": 0.22
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Comparison matrix of US vs European standards across Architecture, Channel Allocation, Geo-Networking, and Security.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "c5471ae9-8daa-4279-b9a9-d0ecd9fbf248",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.85,
        "x": 0.08,
        "y": 0.08
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "The key differences between the US and European C-ITS standards relate to channel allocation, message type, Geo-Networking and security",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "4f703170-543f-4a9e-bd6f-9f31fee797a1",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Comparison frame",
      "slug": "comparison-frame",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "5af8e233-0313-4030-b05a-1902bfcde8f7",
      "evidence": "table/data: Comparison matrix of US vs European standards across Architecture, Channel Allocation, Geo-Networking, and Security",
      "confidence": 0.8
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison_frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "ca78e19f-a9e9-46ea-8757-4c1e514271a6",
      "evidence": "The slide explicitly compares two regional standards across four specific technical criteria.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}