{
  "docId": "019f6b8e-fa73-764f-81e6-f6fa4cfd34d1",
  "docSlug": "jarvis-bcg-dell-and-pivotal-project-denali",
  "documentTitle": "BCG Dell and Pivotal Project Denali",
  "authorId": "bcg-dell-and-pivotal-project-denali",
  "authorName": null,
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": null,
  "aspectRatio": null,
  "pageNumber": 7,
  "pageCount": 16,
  "prevPage": 6,
  "nextPage": 8,
  "slideType": "financial_analysis",
  "function": "quantify_impact",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 9,
  "notes": "The chart uses a waterfall structure to bridge the gap between two financial estimates.",
  "elementsJson": null,
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019f6b8e-fa73-764f-81e6-f6fa4cfd34d1/7",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019f6b8e-fa73-764f-81e6-f6fa4cfd34d1",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019f6b8e-fa73-764f-81e6-f6fa4cfd34d1.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019f6b8e-fa73-764f-81e6-f6fa4cfd34d1#slide-7",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.35,
        "x": 0.48,
        "y": 0.23
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Project Clean's forecast assumed Denali split and achieved mgmt plan; most of the value upside was driven by 9/21 forecast, not the split per se",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "3fc3d70e-593d-492a-92ee-b3b95a53d52a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.65,
        "w": 0.84,
        "x": 0.08,
        "y": 0.22
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Denali post-split DCF value per share: Project Clean vs. current effort",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "waterfall",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "a96a6278-9b81-4bf9-afc6-51909ff61028",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.95
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "1. Numbers shown for current effort are average of high (7.6x multiple) and low (4.5x multiple) cases for Base Case",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "source-note",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "3c15f58a-68ed-4669-931b-0c315936eef9",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.92,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.04
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Difference from Project Clean estimate driven primarily by use of the \"9/21 case\" business forecast",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "c35e612d-81de-4025-8117-7beaf11025cc",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Waterfall chart",
      "slug": "waterfall-chart",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "39eaa094-de4a-46f9-b990-bc7e086a0133",
      "evidence": "chart/waterfall: Denali post-split DCF value per share: Project Clean vs. current effort",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "waterfall",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "62043c30-8332-4ada-ac26-c14b5672b303",
      "evidence": "The chart is a standard waterfall bridge showing components of change between two values.",
      "confidence": 1
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 8,
      "from": 7,
      "beatId": "92e4128d-1699-4e4d-8681-08d8b37c5c25",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "Financial analysis and data tables provide evidence and proof for the arguments made.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 9,
      "from": 7,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "d5d997ac-749d-41e7-9b31-291c81d561fd",
      "evidence": "The financial analysis and open questions suggest a consideration of the cost of inaction.",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "To understand the cost of not taking action on splitting Denali",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}