{
  "docId": "019f6b8e-f132-742f-86ad-7cea57ecd301",
  "docSlug": "jarvis-april-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review",
  "documentTitle": "April 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review",
  "authorId": "april-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review",
  "authorName": null,
  "documentKindSlug": "deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "investor_relations",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Investor relations",
  "presentationDate": "2015-04-01 00:00:00",
  "orientation": null,
  "aspectRatio": null,
  "pageNumber": 21,
  "pageCount": 30,
  "prevPage": 20,
  "nextPage": 22,
  "slideType": "comparison_table",
  "function": "analyze_data",
  "density": "overcrowded",
  "nDataPoints": 18,
  "notes": "Uses a waterfall-style comparison between current and steady state costs across three distinct scenarios.",
  "elementsJson": null,
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019f6b8e-f132-742f-86ad-7cea57ecd301/21",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019f6b8e-f132-742f-86ad-7cea57ecd301",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019f6b8e-f132-742f-86ad-7cea57ecd301.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019f6b8e-f132-742f-86ad-7cea57ecd301#slide-21",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.65,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.67,
        "y": 0.2
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Alternative approach",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-stacked",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "0e17a42f-d86d-47a6-8455-5e5fa81f1939",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.65,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.35,
        "y": 0.2
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Potential scenario 2",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-stacked",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "85ed2a65-df1c-4a5c-adf3-852738567279",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.65,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.2
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Potential scenario 1",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-stacked",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ec1040dd-4360-4b86-b60a-8142fc31da9c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.15,
        "x": 0.8,
        "y": 0.01
      },
      "kind": "legend",
      "text": "Sub/Separate Cost, New Inclusion Cost, New Gen Ed Cost",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "legend",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "4420144a-addd-4819-aca8-aec5ab0f3cc7",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.95,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.9
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "1 Assuming new General Education classrooms needed 40% of the time, and 2.5 students on average moving into an inclusion room\n2 Assuming new General Education classrooms needed 20% of the time, and 4.5 students on average moving into an inclusion room\n3 Assuming ~150 new General Education classrooms, using a small group \"pull-out\" model with \"pull-out\" teacher supporting 20-35 students",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "dd38d221-c518-4a11-9157-87946881a6f3",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.75,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.04
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Financial implications of supporting the transition of substantially separate students into inclusion vary significantly based on core assumptions and approach",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "e3845087-dc8f-4fb5-a016-fbeb3201dc0c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "scenario-analysis",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "64eb3326-36cf-458d-9326-904519320d2f",
      "evidence": "Comparison of three distinct financial models based on varying assumptions",
      "confidence": 0.8
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 25,
      "from": 16,
      "name": "Mece Breakdown",
      "slug": "40-mece-breakdown",
      "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis",
      "matchId": "45d7ea6c-1aa3-46bf-a20e-e1a41b87b8db",
      "evidence": "The document presents a detailed analysis of BPS' operations and identifies areas for improvement",
      "position": 1,
      "objective": "Breaking down complex issues into manageable parts",
      "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}