{
  "docId": "019f6b8e-e229-7535-a4da-414498c7d57f",
  "docSlug": "jarvis-45-ibd-presentation-2008-tercica-inc-lehman-brothers-1",
  "documentTitle": "45 IBD presentation 2008 Tercica Inc Lehman Brothers 1",
  "authorId": "45-ibd-presentation-2008-tercica-inc-lehman-brothers-1",
  "authorName": null,
  "documentKindSlug": "deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "investment_bank",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Investment bank",
  "presentationDate": "2008-01-01 00:00:00",
  "orientation": null,
  "aspectRatio": null,
  "pageNumber": 7,
  "pageCount": 28,
  "prevPage": 6,
  "nextPage": 8,
  "slideType": "comparison_table",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "sparse",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "Lehman Brothers slide, likely from an M&A advisory deck.",
  "elementsJson": null,
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019f6b8e-e229-7535-a4da-414498c7d57f/7",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019f6b8e-e229-7535-a4da-414498c7d57f",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019f6b8e-e229-7535-a4da-414498c7d57f.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019f6b8e-e229-7535-a4da-414498c7d57f#slide-7",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.7,
        "w": 0.85,
        "x": 0.08,
        "y": 0.2
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Table comparing Status Quo, Product/Company Acquisition, Sale/Merger, To Dolphin, and Other Party across Description, Benefits, and Considerations.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "a7a7b71e-8145-4372-9117-484ccdb5b86d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.08,
        "y": 0.08
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Summary of Strategic Alternatives",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "827be899-a55e-486c-81d7-f9d196992580",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison_frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "0262cfbe-9f2a-4635-898b-ec13c8c46ef0",
      "evidence": "The slide uses a structured table to compare strategic options across consistent criteria.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 7,
      "from": 6,
      "beatId": "4224ec03-9ba1-4d4c-8d1b-2630794eaac5",
      "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch",
      "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch",
      "beatName": "Market Size",
      "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-market-size",
      "evidence": "The document presents a comparison table on the overview of current indication of interest, providing context for the market size.",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 7,
      "from": 6,
      "name": "Mece Breakdown",
      "slug": "40-mece-breakdown",
      "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis",
      "matchId": "c7550b0d-f4c6-44d1-b8c1-12ce70f35bf2",
      "evidence": "The document presents a comparison table on the overview of current indication of interest, demonstrating a MECE breakdown of the valuation considerations.",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "To break down the valuation considerations into a comprehensive analysis",
      "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage",
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}