{
  "docId": "019f6b8e-e062-73cd-a715-56106833c13e",
  "docSlug": "jarvis-31-october-2014-bps-rfp-for-audit",
  "documentTitle": "31 October 2014 BPS RFP for audit",
  "authorId": "31-october-2014-bps-rfp-for-audit",
  "authorName": null,
  "documentKindSlug": "deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "investor_relations",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Investor relations",
  "presentationDate": "2014-10-01 00:00:00",
  "orientation": null,
  "aspectRatio": null,
  "pageNumber": 18,
  "pageCount": 41,
  "prevPage": 17,
  "nextPage": 19,
  "slideType": "comparison_table",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "sparse",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "The slide appears to be a continuation of a larger table, starting mid-section with 'Advantageous' and 'Highly Advantageous' rows, followed by a new section '-Project Plan'.",
  "elementsJson": null,
  "metadataConfidence": 0.95,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019f6b8e-e062-73cd-a715-56106833c13e/18",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019f6b8e-e062-73cd-a715-56106833c13e",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019f6b8e-e062-73cd-a715-56106833c13e.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019f6b8e-e062-73cd-a715-56106833c13e#slide-18",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.83,
        "w": 0.786,
        "x": 0.107,
        "y": 0.09
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Rating and Criteria table for proposal evaluation",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "2b27618a-9b0b-4780-8243-f8f4d10aeb73",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.11,
        "x": 0.12,
        "y": 0.385
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "-Project Plan",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "subtitle",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "674ce4a3-752d-458f-82cf-db019a8b8492",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "evaluation-rubric",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "cda3ede6-2289-42fd-8375-06feb80f64e1",
      "evidence": "The slide uses a structured rating scale (Not Advantageous, Advantageous, Highly Advantageous) to define qualitative criteria.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 20,
      "from": 11,
      "beatId": "9697ed9c-5e0e-4d85-8f85-a7158032624b",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "The document provides evaluation criteria and proposal checklists.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 20,
      "from": 17,
      "name": "Mece Breakdown",
      "slug": "40-mece-breakdown",
      "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis",
      "matchId": "49828f5c-e3b8-42af-8575-2cdbbfcf08f7",
      "evidence": "The document provides a comparison table for evaluating proposals.",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "To evaluate proposals based on specific criteria",
      "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}