{
  "docId": "019f6b8e-da53-75e5-a858-9a79c4f926a0",
  "docSlug": "jarvis-15-ibd-presentation-2016-affinity-gaming-deutsche-bank-1",
  "documentTitle": "15 IBD presentation 2016 Affinity Gaming Deutsche Bank 1",
  "authorId": "15-ibd-presentation-2016-affinity-gaming-deutsche-bank-1",
  "authorName": null,
  "documentKindSlug": "deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "investment_bank",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Investment bank",
  "presentationDate": "2016-01-01 00:00:00",
  "orientation": null,
  "aspectRatio": null,
  "pageNumber": 25,
  "pageCount": 37,
  "prevPage": 24,
  "nextPage": 26,
  "slideType": "comparison_table",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 60,
  "notes": "Includes a row for 'Arrow' (likely a placeholder or specific target) and summary statistics.",
  "elementsJson": null,
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019f6b8e-da53-75e5-a858-9a79c4f926a0/25",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019f6b8e-da53-75e5-a858-9a79c4f926a0",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019f6b8e-da53-75e5-a858-9a79c4f926a0.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019f6b8e-da53-75e5-a858-9a79c4f926a0#slide-25",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.58,
        "x": 0.24,
        "y": 0.92
      },
      "kind": "other",
      "text": "Note: Share price and estimates updated as of 8/19/2016. Financial information as of Q1 2016, except for ERI and MCRI which are as of Q2 2016. Source: Company filings, FactSet",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "source-note",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "9e8705cd-1fce-4216-baf3-8abf56a71515",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.45,
        "w": 0.96,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.295
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Company, Ticker, Current price, Equity mkt cap, Total debt, Enterprise value (TEV), EBITDA 2016E, EBITDA 2017E, TEV / EBITDA 2016E, TEV / EBITDA 2017E, Properties",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "valuation",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "06d2a170-9538-4b01-8911-a9468a78a02b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.35,
        "x": 0.23,
        "y": 0.07
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Select trading comparables",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "272adc65-4470-4557-b68f-4a0edbfe68f6",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison_frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "3c901a0b-5b13-4cd8-898b-92416510d6cc",
      "evidence": "Table comparing peer companies across financial metrics",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 29,
      "from": 21,
      "beatId": "b98a22eb-8b24-4ee0-b1b5-10f95363a7ef",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
      "evidence": "The deck provides an illustrative valuation analysis and select trading comparables",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Turn",
      "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 29,
      "from": 24,
      "name": "Logic Chain",
      "slug": "01-logic-chain",
      "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis",
      "matchId": "ed09b72c-2c4d-461d-85fc-2b7f450c3b22",
      "evidence": "The deck presents a series of logical steps to evaluate the transaction's financial implications",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "Evaluate the transaction's financial implications",
      "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion"
    },
    {
      "to": 27,
      "from": 25,
      "name": "Benchmark Gap",
      "slug": "39-benchmark-gap",
      "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting",
      "matchId": "62e950d7-1722-43c8-b209-35133092e2f4",
      "evidence": "The deck presents select trading comparables and EBITDA growth rates",
      "position": 1,
      "objective": "Assess the company's performance relative to peers",
      "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}