{
  "docId": "019de518-2f8c-70e0-8e27-b5eeb9caab3e",
  "docSlug": "9a2da3e17e4fb6685ff57243070ba9ab",
  "documentTitle": "Strategic Organizing Center | Activist Presentation Deck | 65 slides",
  "authorId": "strategic-organizing-center",
  "authorName": "Strategic Organizing Center",
  "documentKindSlug": "activist-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Activist deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "activist_investor",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Activist investor",
  "presentationDate": "2024-02-01 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.7777778,
  "pageNumber": 52,
  "pageCount": 65,
  "prevPage": 51,
  "nextPage": 53,
  "slideType": "expose_contradiction",
  "function": "expose_contradiction",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 7,
  "notes": null,
  "elementsJson": null,
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019de518-2f8c-70e0-8e27-b5eeb9caab3e/52",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019de518-2f8c-70e0-8e27-b5eeb9caab3e",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019de518-2f8c-70e0-8e27-b5eeb9caab3e.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de518-2f8c-70e0-8e27-b5eeb9caab3e#slide-52",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.096,
        "x": 0.046,
        "y": 0.928
      },
      "kind": "image",
      "text": "BREW A BETTER STARBUCKS",
      "attrs": {},
      "subkind": "logo",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "159e3256-b3c3-4a74-9752-0dbc297e379e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.799,
        "x": 0.15,
        "y": 0.93
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "*Source: Bloomberg, Starbucks' Threats to Union Activist Violated Law, NLRB Says, By Robert lafolla (Feb. 14, 2024); Boston Globe, Starbucks union vote sealed in Newton, Somerville over labor dispute, By Katie Johnston (June 16, 2023); Bloomberg, Starbucks Hit With Sweeping Complaint for Refusal to Bargain, By lan Kullgren (Jan. 12, 2024); Bloomberg, Starbucks Accused by Second Union of Bargaining in Bad Faith, By Josh Eidelson (Dec. 12, 2023); Huffington Post, Starbucks Is Sending 1 Lucky Barista To Costa Rica, But Not If They're In A Union, By Dave Jamieson (Feb. 6, 2024)",
      "attrs": {},
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "91c15d14-f2eb-4df3-a0d1-21e61edf96ce",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.787,
        "w": 0.939,
        "x": 0.036,
        "y": 0.13
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Starbucks' Myths / Misrepresentations: \"Starbucks is fully committed to the rights of our partners to organize, freely associate and collectively bargain.\" \"Our approach to good faith bargaining has been consistent with decades of NLRB precedent.\" \"We continue to respect the outcome of fairly conducted elections and approach the bargaining table in good faith – with the aim of reaching ratified contracts for each represented store in 2024.\" \"We proposed 525+ single-store bargaining sessions and appeared in-person at 120+ single-store negotiations...\" \"In this timeframe, we have met with other unions, achieving tentative agreements and collective bargaining agreements.\" \"We sent a public letter to Workers United in an attempt to resume productive negotiations.\" \"Starbucks has no 'anti-union playbook'\" The Reality*: Since December 2021, the NLRB has issued 133 complaints against Starbucks; the Company has also been the target in a third of all injunctions brought by the NLRB since January 2022. NLRB administrative law judges make rulings based on precedent and in 48 of 49 cases that have gone to trial, have found Starbucks guilty of labor law violations. Starbucks regularly challenges the results of elections. In one instance, votes at two stores in Massachusetts were were put on hold when the Company filed last-minute charges in an attempt to block the elections. Additionally, the union won an election in Medford, Oregon last week that the company is challenging. Starbucks has had full proposals from the union since October 2022 and yet has not reached a single tentative agreement on a contract clause or offered a counter proposal to a single proposal. In December 2023, Starbucks was accused by a second union – the Teamsters union, which represents workers at a location in Pennsylvania – of engaging in \"a protracted campaign of bad faith and surface bargaining\". In early February, Starbucks Workers United filed 47 new federal unfair labor practice charges since the public letter to Workers United to purportedly resume negotiations. The charges included alleged forced store closures, illegal firings and offering raises and other benefits to workers at nonunion stores. According to pleadings in the shareholder derivative case: \"As recognized by the NLRB, Starbucks unlawful response to unionization efforts suggests a centralized response to the nationwide union campaign. The highest levels of the Company management...were responsible for designing and executing SBUX response.\"",
      "attrs": {},
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "d164a839-fe55-4f40-9c73-b28bde0b44e9",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.035,
        "w": 0.906,
        "x": 0.049,
        "y": 0.049
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Myths vs. Reality: Starbucks' Response to Unionization",
      "attrs": {},
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "9fdbf6c2-6c51-4a7f-80bf-9eefcce5ada4",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}