{
  "docId": "019de510-522d-7343-a8bc-cdeac11e8f77",
  "docSlug": "d2f3c00bbcd83c3a4270f9c8b7a1df13",
  "documentTitle": "Mambu | Start Up Pitch Deck | 10 slides",
  "authorId": "mambu",
  "authorName": "Mambu",
  "documentKindSlug": "pitchdeck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Pitch deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "investor_relations",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Investor relations",
  "presentationDate": "2021-01-01 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.7663293,
  "pageNumber": 6,
  "pageCount": 10,
  "prevPage": 5,
  "nextPage": 7,
  "slideType": "solution",
  "function": "present_solution",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "The slide uses a comparison framework to contrast traditional banking with Mambu's composable architecture.",
  "elementsJson": null,
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019de510-522d-7343-a8bc-cdeac11e8f77/6",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019de510-522d-7343-a8bc-cdeac11e8f77",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019de510-522d-7343-a8bc-cdeac11e8f77.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de510-522d-7343-a8bc-cdeac11e8f77#slide-6",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "framework",
      "text": "Comparison of traditional banking vs Mambu across 10 principles",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "instance",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "b1256020-0acd-4817-b5f1-244389b652ae",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.5,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.65,
        "y": 0.3
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Revenue growth while optimising costs; Business agility & flexibility; Composable architecture",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "b581da99-15ae-4e4e-9c50-be5d6eb4523a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.7,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.2
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Principles of composable banking vs Traditional banking vs Mambu",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "comparison",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "b23ed3ae-b8a5-43de-97f4-f6bfa196b17f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.8,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.05
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Our composable approach enables banking like a modern tech company",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ded52712-167a-4593-b7a7-a8d82bc4fc94",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison-frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "dc73e40e-27dd-4a43-9fde-c7d7c3653d07",
      "evidence": "Direct comparison table between traditional banking and Mambu across specific principles.",
      "confidence": 1
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 6,
      "from": 4,
      "beatId": "840a73e8-c6a7-4a64-a539-fc83c3aaedbd",
      "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch",
      "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch",
      "beatName": "Solution",
      "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-solution",
      "evidence": "The deck presents Mambu's composable banking methodology and cloud native tech stack as the solution.",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Turn",
      "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 6,
      "from": 4,
      "name": "Mece Breakdown",
      "slug": "40-mece-breakdown",
      "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis",
      "matchId": "7cf832f9-bcb1-401a-b2f4-e24a5f5ce67f",
      "evidence": "The deck presents the composable banking methodology and cloud native tech stack as a comprehensive solution.",
      "position": 1,
      "objective": "Break down the solution into its components",
      "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}