{
  "docId": "019de50f-ec21-75e2-98f1-40b25a0c38fd",
  "docSlug": "996fa54499c8cebe29cb43c884c8f32f",
  "documentTitle": "Paya | SPAC Presentation Deck | 40 slides",
  "authorId": "paya",
  "authorName": "Paya",
  "documentKindSlug": "pitchdeck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Pitch deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "investment_bank",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Investment bank",
  "presentationDate": "2020-08-01 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
  "pageNumber": 14,
  "pageCount": 40,
  "prevPage": 13,
  "nextPage": 15,
  "slideType": "competitive_analysis",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 54,
  "notes": "The table highlights Paya's competitive advantage in CNP volume percentage and average ticket size.",
  "elementsJson": null,
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019de50f-ec21-75e2-98f1-40b25a0c38fd/14",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019de50f-ec21-75e2-98f1-40b25a0c38fd",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019de50f-ec21-75e2-98f1-40b25a0c38fd.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de50f-ec21-75e2-98f1-40b25a0c38fd#slide-14",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.91
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: Nilson Report (2019) and Company Annual Reports. Note: Excludes bank-owned or affiliated processors and those that do not report to Nilson",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "2726aeb6-dcdc-4baf-8867-2c69c9158174",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.75,
        "w": 0.94,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.15
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Key 2019 Card Metrics table comparing 10 processors across 7 metrics",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "333c1dca-b785-4bec-a5ab-1a2fb8be901b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.75,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.09
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Largest pure play integrated payments provider with larger customers than peers",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "action-title",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "763e1aa9-f46a-4663-a13a-3afd0cffeb4b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.75,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.03
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Paya is a Leading Independent Platform of Scale",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "d151a2f1-ec16-4072-a677-9293af2caa62",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "2x2 matrix",
      "slug": "matrix-2x2",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "c6f002d2-37a7-4108-ac0b-85fffaf8df9b",
      "evidence": "Although not explicitly a 2x2 matrix, the table comparing key metrics across processors could be related to a matrix analysis.",
      "confidence": 0.5
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison_frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "9f9355ab-a69b-4bdb-b386-77743cb39957",
      "evidence": "Direct comparison of Paya against 9 competitors across key performance metrics.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 14,
      "from": 13,
      "beatId": "ba71b99d-e449-418a-9883-fe998c391830",
      "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch",
      "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch",
      "beatName": "Problem",
      "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-problem",
      "evidence": "Slides 13-14 discuss the massive secular shift to integrated payments and Paya's unique position",
      "position": 0,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Complication",
      "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 30,
      "from": 13,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "0ab5aa41-e734-4d42-adcc-a5ee8531f54e",
      "evidence": "The deck presents a clear narrative on the secular shift to integrated payments and Paya's potential for growth",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "What are the consequences of not investing in integrated payments?",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    },
    {
      "to": 32,
      "from": 6,
      "name": "Quick Win Big Bet",
      "slug": "47-quick-win-big-bet",
      "bestFor": "Transformation planning, 100-day plans, resource allocation",
      "matchId": "44509bfa-e739-4278-b7c2-e2494bf9df40",
      "evidence": "The deck presents Paya's solution and growth strategy",
      "position": 1,
      "objective": "Can Paya deliver quick wins and big bets for investors?",
      "structure": "The Full List -> Quick Wins (Low effort, High impact) -> Big Bets (High effort, High impact) -> Sequenced Roadmap",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "Separate initiatives into immediate wins and longer-term strategic bets"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}