{
  "docId": "019de50f-deb3-7549-89dd-1a0764e872a1",
  "docSlug": "f1115f382d6fbeacbef41e67564254b0",
  "documentTitle": "Terraform Labs | Product Presentation Deck | 13 slides",
  "authorId": "terraform-labs",
  "authorName": "Terraform Labs",
  "documentKindSlug": "deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "investor_relations",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Investor relations",
  "presentationDate": "2020-07-01 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.7728531,
  "pageNumber": 6,
  "pageCount": 13,
  "prevPage": 5,
  "nextPage": 7,
  "slideType": "comparison_table",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 4,
  "notes": "The slide uses a simple comparison to argue for the value proposition of crypto assets based on yield.",
  "elementsJson": null,
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019de50f-deb3-7549-89dd-1a0764e872a1/6",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019de50f-deb3-7549-89dd-1a0764e872a1",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019de50f-deb3-7549-89dd-1a0764e872a1.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de50f-deb3-7549-89dd-1a0764e872a1#slide-6",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.1,
        "x": 0.25,
        "y": 0.45
      },
      "kind": "legend",
      "text": "0.8%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "3a265e80-bf57-47cc-833e-b19b4cf2804f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.1,
        "x": 0.65,
        "y": 0.45
      },
      "kind": "legend",
      "text": "8%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ba3cbc19-f2aa-40ff-8b6a-3e72091e08fa",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.2,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.15,
        "y": 0.5
      },
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "108%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "big-number",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "3fbac70f-1114-477a-939a-d755a8b28026",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.2,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.55,
        "y": 0.5
      },
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "216%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "big-number",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "6aface36-f845-424a-9e0c-c0faf48ed2f6",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.35,
        "y": 0.8
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Compounded 10 year returns",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "6bc5f54a-f635-4e8d-b762-afb435686740",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.2,
        "w": 0.7,
        "x": 0.15,
        "y": 0.15
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Crypto needs to offer better passive income than fiat to be a better hold for the everyday user",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "action-title",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "c5358a99-bec6-4ff1-9728-1710880eb3de",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Comparison frame",
      "slug": "comparison-frame",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "a5e3b396-5e5b-443f-801f-b4453b441f0b",
      "evidence": "Crypto needs to offer better passive income than fiat to be a better hold for the everyday user",
      "confidence": 0.7
    },
    {
      "name": "Table data",
      "slug": "table-data",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "468fe42e-8419-4d73-bd2a-5be64fa1a1c9",
      "evidence": "Compounded 10 year returns\nlegend: 0.8%\nmetric/big-number: 108%\nmetric/big-number: 216%",
      "confidence": 0.8
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison_frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "dd8e57c4-bfd3-482f-81c4-402d00fc965d",
      "evidence": "Direct comparison of two financial options to highlight superiority",
      "confidence": 0.8
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 6,
      "from": 5,
      "beatId": "947643b9-afe8-4374-b198-06629aab89f2",
      "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
      "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
      "beatName": "Problem (Identify pain)",
      "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-problem-identify-pain",
      "evidence": "The deck identifies the poor holding features of crypto and the volatility of DeFi lending markets as key pain points.",
      "position": 0,
      "confidence": 0.9,
      "parentBeatName": "Complication",
      "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
    },
    {
      "to": 8,
      "from": 6,
      "beatId": "5f1d27d3-5f2b-48d3-a25a-a84febbb9476",
      "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
      "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
      "beatName": "Agitate (Make it worse)",
      "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse",
      "evidence": "The deck highlights the limitations of current DeFi lending markets, emphasizing the need for a better solution.",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 0.9,
      "parentBeatName": "Development",
      "parentBeatSlug": "development"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 6,
      "from": 2,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "c83a94e5-3bc2-479f-b8c9-811727686ce4",
      "evidence": "The deck highlights the limitations of current crypto and DeFi solutions, implying that not adopting ANCHOR would mean missing out on superior yields and adoption.",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "What are the consequences of not adopting ANCHOR?",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    },
    {
      "to": 10,
      "from": 3,
      "name": "Golden Circle",
      "slug": "11-golden-circle",
      "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements",
      "matchId": "4c7250fa-a0b9-46c4-9b16-bc1092586202",
      "evidence": "The deck presents ANCHOR's unique value proposition, highlighting its technical advantages and benefits.",
      "position": 1,
      "objective": "Why ANCHOR?",
      "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}