{
  "docId": "019de50f-0e55-779d-9c37-bb69a11bf6f2",
  "docSlug": "777eeda6d89ed16bb5f89a74b017b9bf",
  "documentTitle": "Baird | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 35 slides",
  "authorId": "baird",
  "authorName": "Baird",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "investment_bank",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Investment bank",
  "presentationDate": "2018-06-01 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.3333334,
  "pageNumber": 24,
  "pageCount": 35,
  "prevPage": 23,
  "nextPage": 25,
  "slideType": "comparison_table",
  "function": "compare_options",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 8,
  "notes": "The slide compares AM Stand-Alone vs New AMGP across four focus areas: Size/Liquidity, Distribution Growth, Financial Health, and Structure.",
  "elementsJson": null,
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019de50f-0e55-779d-9c37-bb69a11bf6f2/24",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019de50f-0e55-779d-9c37-bb69a11bf6f2",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019de50f-0e55-779d-9c37-bb69a11bf6f2.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de50f-0e55-779d-9c37-bb69a11bf6f2#slide-24",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.96,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.15
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Though the measurable cash flow impact to AR resulting from the acquisition is relatively immaterial, the pro forma “new AMGP” has characteristics that are important to midstream investors and that may enhance the value of AR’s midstream holdings (and improve its trade-ability)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "47dbca56-de85-4de6-a343-76d0cf41414f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.2,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.97
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "(1) Based on current AMGP share price.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "76ccdbf4-04ff-49a3-8a60-952a635eb695",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.65,
        "w": 0.96,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.27
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Comparison table of AM Stand-Alone vs New AMGP across 4 metrics",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "d890c358-b2f5-4c0f-8d09-c62c72810488",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.06
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "POTENTIAL FOR AMGP VALUE UPLIFT",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "638242a0-90d0-4edc-bed4-b0001aa7e6b0",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Comparison frame",
      "slug": "comparison-frame",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "43a45835-95be-4eb6-bbdb-2b5bb297d2ea",
      "evidence": "table/data: Comparison table of AM Stand-Alone vs New AMGP across 4 metrics",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 29,
      "from": 20,
      "beatId": "0498aed6-7b77-4541-b0d6-ca38dcc84d99",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "The document provides supporting data and analysis to justify the proposal",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 29,
      "from": 20,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "06b1a746-7cd3-4a8c-b2c1-61219c49c8d7",
      "evidence": "The document mentions the potential risks and costs of inaction",
      "position": 1,
      "objective": "To highlight the potential risks and costs of not pursuing the proposed transaction",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}