{
  "docId": "019de50e-9af1-73fb-b51c-b5d977e7aea8",
  "docSlug": "f72614474a6138eaf8e7b963f4b533d9",
  "documentTitle": "Centerview Partners | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 16 slides",
  "authorId": "centerview-partners",
  "authorName": "Centerview Partners",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "investment_bank",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Investment bank",
  "presentationDate": "2013-05-01 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.294673,
  "pageNumber": 6,
  "pageCount": 16,
  "prevPage": 5,
  "nextPage": 7,
  "slideType": "data_table",
  "function": "analyze_data",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 60,
  "notes": "The table highlights the progression from initial proposal to the current revised proposal, emphasizing EV/MHz-pop and various premium metrics.",
  "elementsJson": null,
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019de50e-9af1-73fb-b51c-b5d977e7aea8/6",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019de50e-9af1-73fb-b51c-b5d977e7aea8",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019de50e-9af1-73fb-b51c-b5d977e7aea8.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de50e-9af1-73fb-b51c-b5d977e7aea8#slide-6",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.65,
        "x": 0.107,
        "y": 0.8
      },
      "kind": "disclaimer",
      "text": "Source: Collie management, Company filings and FactSet, as of May 20, 2013. Note: U.S. dollars in millions, except per MHz-pop and per share amounts. Date ranges reflect calendar ranges. Capitalization data have been updated to reflect current shares and debt outstanding.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "95da7a1a-7de1-402d-b1f1-d83e4e8258fd",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.55,
        "w": 0.65,
        "x": 0.18,
        "y": 0.24
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Financial data table comparing Shepherd/St. Bernard, Prelim Proposal, Leak, Current, Merger Agreement, and Revised Proposal across price, equity value, enterprise value, EV/MHz-pop, transaction highlights, and premia.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "f2c74276-6ad3-4376-a2f3-9d1a0c4ffba0",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.35,
        "x": 0.107,
        "y": 0.125
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Overview of Shepherd Proposal",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "a4e62719-976f-494a-b6bb-95cd3d4f1f51",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.2,
        "x": 0.107,
        "y": 0.175
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Key Financial Statistics",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "subtitle",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "4c9ab5bd-d113-41f0-b542-c9c1a24c100d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 12,
      "from": 5,
      "beatId": "cf63ec41-9595-4186-a505-40d08401fa11",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "The deck presents various data tables, financial analysis, and precedent transactions to support the proposal.",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 16,
      "from": 3,
      "name": "Logic Chain",
      "slug": "01-logic-chain",
      "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis",
      "matchId": "d6a92cb4-c535-4268-aaba-bec178d75147",
      "evidence": "The deck presents a clear logical flow from situation to solution.",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "To logically connect the situation, evidence, and proposed solution.",
      "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}