{
  "docId": "019de50e-97f5-74a1-b298-c3e50cc61855",
  "docSlug": "cd4fc41c001959905d71a6a4d0994dc9",
  "documentTitle": "Centerview Partners | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 6 slides",
  "authorId": "centerview-partners",
  "authorName": "Centerview Partners",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "investment_bank",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Investment bank",
  "presentationDate": "2012-12-01 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.3324081,
  "pageNumber": 4,
  "pageCount": 6,
  "prevPage": 3,
  "nextPage": 5,
  "slideType": "financial_analysis",
  "function": "analyze_data",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 60,
  "notes": "The slide uses a table structure to compare two scenarios (Single vs Multiple Carrier) and two assumptions (No Holders Tender vs 100% Holders Tender).",
  "elementsJson": null,
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019de50e-97f5-74a1-b298-c3e50cc61855/4",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019de50e-97f5-74a1-b298-c3e50cc61855",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019de50e-97f5-74a1-b298-c3e50cc61855.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de50e-97f5-74a1-b298-c3e50cc61855#slide-4",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.25,
        "x": 0.65,
        "y": 0.78
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Refinancing of Senior Secured Notes could help address funding gap",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "7f4a6f56-3aa6-4a92-aa6e-ef6759eaf1e4",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.06,
        "y": 0.92
      },
      "kind": "disclaimer",
      "text": "Source: Financial projections per Collie management. Note: U.S. dollars in millions. (1) Based on weighted average interest rate of 12.25% on Senior Secured Notes.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "d6036834-b6fd-47c4-9c01-ead4edaedb1e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.6,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.06,
        "y": 0.24
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Financial table comparing Single Carrier Case and Multiple Carrier Case across various cash flow metrics and years (2013E-2017E).",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "8c1fbf41-3999-48f7-8a2d-f45778ac5752",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.06,
        "y": 0.08
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Illustrative Cash Flow Impact of Potential Dalmatian Transaction",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5ae0560b-c563-4884-9cd1-d54953f04dbc",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 6,
      "from": 4,
      "beatId": "b16fce99-2c2d-4658-a615-c14b31884d4a",
      "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch",
      "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch",
      "beatName": "Financials",
      "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-financials",
      "evidence": "Illustrative Cash Flow Impact and Future Realizable Spectrum Value",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    },
    {
      "to": 6,
      "from": 4,
      "beatId": "9370d443-03c7-46c1-95eb-62984a59a367",
      "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch",
      "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch",
      "beatName": "Solution",
      "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-solution",
      "evidence": "Implications of the deal on cash flow and spectrum value",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Turn",
      "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 6,
      "from": 3,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "cba07af5-3b4f-49d0-9fa5-ece419055cce",
      "evidence": "Financial impact analysis suggests an implicit cost of inaction",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "What is the cost of not pursuing the Dalmatian transaction?",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    },
    {
      "to": 6,
      "from": 4,
      "name": "Quick Win Big Bet",
      "slug": "47-quick-win-big-bet",
      "bestFor": "Transformation planning, 100-day plans, resource allocation",
      "matchId": "3e331831-48ee-4e4e-9244-dd3c43b8599c",
      "evidence": "Future realizable spectrum value implies potential for a big bet",
      "position": 1,
      "objective": "Is this a quick win or a big bet?",
      "structure": "The Full List -> Quick Wins (Low effort, High impact) -> Big Bets (High effort, High impact) -> Sequenced Roadmap",
      "confidence": 0.5,
      "description": "Separate initiatives into immediate wins and longer-term strategic bets"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}