{
  "docId": "019de074-166c-73bb-b6b3-c55894c45f7f",
  "docSlug": "9cd177b244d4542f52197a75b80a3e6d",
  "documentTitle": "Azek | Investor Presentation Deck | 37 slides",
  "authorId": "azek",
  "authorName": "Azek",
  "documentKindSlug": "pitchdeck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Pitch deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "investor_relations",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Investor relations",
  "presentationDate": "2022-12-01 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.7777778,
  "pageNumber": 8,
  "pageCount": 37,
  "prevPage": 7,
  "nextPage": 9,
  "slideType": "market_sizing",
  "function": "size_opportunity",
  "density": "overcrowded",
  "nDataPoints": 7,
  "notes": "Uses a before-and-after visual comparison for decking and specific conversion percentages for trim and railing.",
  "elementsJson": null,
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019de074-166c-73bb-b6b3-c55894c45f7f/8",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019de074-166c-73bb-b6b3-c55894c45f7f",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019de074-166c-73bb-b6b3-c55894c45f7f.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de074-166c-73bb-b6b3-c55894c45f7f#slide-8",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.2,
        "w": 0.12,
        "x": 0.85,
        "y": 0.53
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "We believe the wood alternative decking market could reach ~50% share over time (vs. today's ~22%)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "d31801a3-c16f-4137-b998-fca730512365",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.35,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.55,
        "y": 0.48
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Composite Decking Gaining Share (% of total market linear feet)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-vertical",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "941e03a2-dfb4-4925-90dc-94b80b1890af",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.65,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.18
      },
      "kind": "image",
      "text": "Before and after comparison of wood vs composite decking",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "photo",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "7656ecbb-7f85-40e3-8e4a-e7fb55cd01ed",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.2,
        "x": 0.28,
        "y": 0.73
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Long-term beauty; 50-Year fade and stain warranty; More environmentally sustainable than pressure treated decking",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "10b3de74-8961-400d-a374-dadb1cba283b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.2,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.73
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Prone to moisture damage, fading, rot; Requires maintenance and staining; Inconsistent visuals over time",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "c5b044df-e65c-4851-a4d5-69a805022126",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.2,
        "x": 0.75,
        "y": 0.88
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "See APPENDIX page 21 for details and sources.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "abddaabe-41bb-4fc0-ba04-a232ddf36e09",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.11
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "COMBINED, WOOD STILL REPRESENTS ~64% OF OUR CORE MARKETS TODAY",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "action-title",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "3d1fc74b-317c-46ed-931b-247d9aadd734",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.8,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.05
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "SIGNIFICANT WOOD CONVERSION OPPORTUNITY, EARLY IN THE JOURNEY",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "04e2373c-8f59-449f-8c86-ea6048477b75",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Before-After-Bridge",
      "slug": "before-after-bridge",
      "agent": "Storyteller",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "85d461dd-2aa9-42f7-b1de-4c531bc87471",
      "evidence": "The slide compares wood and composite decking, showing the benefits of conversion.",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "before-after-framing",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "ff3c8eff-6ad7-4456-a32b-95f8028547d7",
      "evidence": "Visual comparison of wood vs composite decking",
      "confidence": 1
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 8,
      "from": 7,
      "beatId": "759d96df-1abe-4b39-b93c-8ab2371b3f21",
      "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch",
      "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch",
      "beatName": "Problem",
      "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-problem",
      "evidence": "Slides 7-8 discuss the market opportunity and the limitations of traditional materials",
      "position": 0,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Complication",
      "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
    },
    {
      "to": 8,
      "from": 7,
      "beatId": "372a9868-0e30-4854-a1e7-ae8ccb110567",
      "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch",
      "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch",
      "beatName": "Market Size",
      "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-market-size",
      "evidence": "Slides 7-8 discuss the market opportunity",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 8,
      "from": 7,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "90762d51-1d6a-49a6-927b-a40cad9f8e9c",
      "evidence": "Slides 7-8 discuss the limitations of traditional materials",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "Highlight the cost of inaction in traditional materials",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}