{
  "docId": "019de073-89b5-70df-a529-eec548df9be3",
  "docSlug": "5ca8326098db5e4f079b2895e47fd281",
  "documentTitle": "Foxo | Investor Presentation Deck | 36 slides",
  "authorId": "foxo",
  "authorName": "FOXO",
  "documentKindSlug": "pitchdeck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Pitch deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "investor_relations",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Investor relations",
  "presentationDate": "2022-09-01 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.7777778,
  "pageNumber": 30,
  "pageCount": 36,
  "prevPage": 29,
  "nextPage": 31,
  "slideType": "comparison_table",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 15,
  "notes": "The slide highlights the 'Protective Value Benefit' for saliva-based testing compared to traditional medical underwriting.",
  "elementsJson": null,
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019de073-89b5-70df-a529-eec548df9be3/30",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019de073-89b5-70df-a529-eec548df9be3",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019de073-89b5-70df-a529-eec548df9be3.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de073-89b5-70df-a529-eec548df9be3#slide-30",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.1,
        "x": 0.8,
        "y": 0.78
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Protective Value Benefit",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "9a47153f-e87d-4b68-bbd3-498f82dcf6fc",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.2,
        "x": 0.08,
        "y": 0.25
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Example: $2M policy, male, age 35",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "900f5ad9-2f52-4c93-89bd-55530ecf6fc2",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.08,
        "y": 0.85
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "(1) SOA VBT Tables (2018)\n(2) $333 represents the modeled cost to insurance carriers at scale ($160 cost of epigenetic testing plus $173 (5% of premiums using services platform)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "4d9513d4-b7a2-4575-808b-322be36e41b7",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.45,
        "w": 0.84,
        "x": 0.08,
        "y": 0.33
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Comparison table of underwriting methods",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "6f2f943a-de4f-4fa3-b332-960372b68a74",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.06,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.08,
        "y": 0.13
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Underwriting protective value framework",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5af4f6e4-9081-498f-864a-2a3a25a8f4ad",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison-frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "91fc8128-4904-4045-b69f-3ffd491255f8",
      "evidence": "Table comparing underwriting methods across cost and benefit metrics.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 36,
      "from": 26,
      "beatId": "f68448b6-3563-4274-8e4b-bbf597161699",
      "arcName": "The Sparkline",
      "arcSlug": "sparkline",
      "beatName": "Action",
      "beatSlug": "aida-action",
      "evidence": "The roadmap and closing ask prompt action",
      "position": 5,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
      "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 30,
      "from": 26,
      "name": "Quick Win Big Bet",
      "slug": "47-quick-win-big-bet",
      "bestFor": "Transformation planning, 100-day plans, resource allocation",
      "matchId": "0a997b50-9979-4e28-8f61-bd1d9a334c37",
      "evidence": "The deck presents quick wins and big bets",
      "position": 3,
      "objective": "Quick wins and big bets",
      "structure": "The Full List -> Quick Wins (Low effort, High impact) -> Big Bets (High effort, High impact) -> Sequenced Roadmap",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "Separate initiatives into immediate wins and longer-term strategic bets"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}