{
  "docId": "019de073-8820-74ff-a67f-554bf446ec62",
  "docSlug": "cb43203a63913e468ce1bb93089d7dd7",
  "documentTitle": "Evercore | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 69 slides",
  "authorId": "evercore",
  "authorName": "Evercore",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "investment_bank",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Investment bank",
  "presentationDate": "2022-09-01 00:00:00",
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.2938006,
  "pageNumber": 35,
  "pageCount": 69,
  "prevPage": 34,
  "nextPage": 36,
  "slideType": "sensitivity_analysis",
  "function": "compare_options",
  "density": "sparse",
  "nDataPoints": 4,
  "notes": "The slide uses a comparison table format to contrast two sensitivity scenarios.",
  "elementsJson": null,
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019de073-8820-74ff-a67f-554bf446ec62/35",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019de073-8820-74ff-a67f-554bf446ec62",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019de073-8820-74ff-a67f-554bf446ec62.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019de073-8820-74ff-a67f-554bf446ec62#slide-35",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.65,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.21
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Comparison of Capital Expenditures and Debt assumptions for Sensitivity Case 1 and 2.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "scenario",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "83779a04-c0df-4249-a03c-a3d545c3d851",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.08
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Preliminary Valuation of SIRE Common Units",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "2029347e-b993-4a9a-a599-c918cd7f7fed",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.35,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.13
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Sensitivity Cases – Assumptions (cont'd)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "subtitle",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "181deb06-cc3c-4658-af6a-0e66441601d8",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Table data",
      "slug": "table-data",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "f0784a95-263e-4ed2-a42e-1c4441ff5a1b",
      "evidence": "Comparison of Capital Expenditures and Debt assumptions",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 40,
      "from": 31,
      "beatId": "b4349b46-29a2-4df7-ab59-8d5d83b6844b",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "This section presents financial analysis and sensitivity cases.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 40,
      "from": 32,
      "name": "Mece Breakdown",
      "slug": "40-mece-breakdown",
      "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis",
      "matchId": "d517978c-1805-45af-8ae6-8c1bf2597f29",
      "evidence": "The document uses a detailed financial analysis and sensitivity cases.",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "To break down the valuation into manageable parts",
      "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories"
    },
    {
      "to": 39,
      "from": 34,
      "name": "Hypothesis Test",
      "slug": "42-hypothesis-test",
      "bestFor": "Strategy validation, due diligence, research presentations",
      "matchId": "863b2534-f97b-43d1-8be0-463c2f7c4380",
      "evidence": "The document presents sensitivity cases and financial analysis.",
      "position": 2,
      "objective": "To test hypotheses about SIRE's valuation",
      "structure": "The Hypothesis -> Test 1 (Supports/Refutes) -> Test 2 (Supports/Refutes) -> Conclusion (Validated/Pivoted)",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "State a hypothesis upfront, then systematically prove or disprove it with evidence"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}